FHIR Chat · PACIO ADI Block-Vote-2 · Advance Directives

Stream: Advance Directives

Topic: PACIO ADI Block-Vote-2


view this post on Zulip Corey Spears (Apr 07 2022 at 18:08):

As discussed on the 2022-04-07 Patient Empowerment (PE) Workgroup call we are proposing the following block vote 2 as a part of STU1 ballot reconciliation for the Re-Assessment Timepoints IG to be voted on at next week’s PE meeting (Thursday, 2022-04-14).

You may withdraw any item from the block vote by responding to this email with the specific Key for the item you wish to withdraw or do so on the PE WG call prior to the vote.

Jira search string: project = FHIR AND Specification = "US PACIO Advance Directive Interoperability (FHIR) [FHIR-us-pacio-adi]" AND Grouping =Block-Vote-2 ORDER BY priority DESC, updated DESC

ID Summary Proposed Disposition Reporter
FHIR-34508 Must support designation for emptyReason? Persuasive with Mod. Craig Newman
FHIR-34518 Authorization extension doesn't constrain to the ADI consent profile Persuasive with Mod. Craig Newman
FHIR-34795 don't normatively reference smarthealthit.org Persuasive Isaac Vetter
FHIR-34797 Is support of Consent required, or not? Not Persuasive with Mod. Isaac Vetter
FHIR-34798 incompatible with 800-52 Persuasive Isaac Vetter
FHIR-34819 Some Extensions Don't Belong On Composition Persuasive with Mod. Michael Brodsky
FHIR-35077 Inconsistent profile names Persuasive Daniel Vreeman
FHIR-35678 Remove "PACIO" in title and profiles Persuasive Matt Elrod

@Craig Newman @Isaac Vetter @Daniel Vreeman @Matt Elrod

view this post on Zulip Corey Spears (Apr 08 2022 at 17:32):

It has been requested that the following ticket be removed because there is more conversation needed to determine where data enter, performers, participants, etc should be captured.
FHIR-34819 - Some Extensions Don't Belong On Composition
@Lisa Nelson


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC