Stream: Da+Vinci+PDex+Plan-Net
Topic: Organization Reference
Jason Teeple (May 11 2020 at 23:44):
Within the Practitioner Profile there are references to Organization - Is there an assumption that Organization Profiles need to be built out for Qualification.identifier.assigner, Qualification Issuer, and Identifier Assigner?
Qualification.identifier.assigner and Identifier Assigner both have the same comment: Comments
"... may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization." http://hl7.org/fhir/R4/datatypes-definitions.html#Identifier.assigner
Yet Qualification Issuer does not have the same comment. Need helping understanding how to present Qualification Issuer? Can I follow the same comments from Qualification.identifier.assigner and Identifier Assigner?
Saul Kravitz (May 12 2020 at 17:30):
@Robert Dieterle
Josh Lamb (May 12 2020 at 23:33):
Hi Jason,
Based upon what I heard, for this IG anything flagged with Must Support means that if you have the data you must provide it. So if you know the organization that assigned the qualification associated with a Practitioner it is expected that you provide it. This IG references the base version of Organization, so that does leave things open in terms of what data you provide about the organization.
Jason Teeple (May 13 2020 at 10:44):
The attributes that are in question are not flagged as Must Support or have a card of 1..1. I questioning the definition variation between the three attributes.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
