FHIR Chat · capture contacts · Covid-19 Response

Stream: Covid-19 Response

Topic: capture contacts


view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 06 2020 at 15:08):

Is there already an IG describing how to capture contacts of the patient?

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 06 2020 at 15:09):

I'm now involved in a very small project which wants to create an app in which the infected patient can add all the contacts he had the past X days.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (May 06 2020 at 15:10):

So just the people, or people + locations (and timeframes)?

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (May 06 2020 at 15:14):

there are profiles on Patient, but those profiles have the intention of making the Patient resource as fully identifiable as possible to enable Treatment use-cases. I presume you are asking about a very different PurposeOfUse, such as population-health contract-tracing.

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (May 06 2020 at 15:16):

I expect purposeOfUse of population health contract tracing could use the Patient profile for Treatment.. but I would recommend that a Privacy, Security, and ConsumerEmpowerment perspective might ask that a different set of traits are needed. More focused on CURRENT CONTACT details, and less on factors that are needed for SAFE healthcare treatment.

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (May 06 2020 at 15:21):

For example US-Core patient requires that the patient gender is populated, which doesn't seem all that critical for contact tracing. Even though it might seem useful in a salutation. The Patient in US-Core mandates the MRN be present, which is clearly not important or relevant in a contact tracing (some humans have never been a patient).
see https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/US-Core-R4/StructureDefinition-us-core-patient.html

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (May 06 2020 at 15:29):

Might be better to look at Profiles on Person Resource which is not intended to be patient specific...

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (May 06 2020 at 15:29):

Surely Simplifier has some way to search across everything in Simplifier for all profiles on Person; but I can't figure out how to do that.

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 07 2020 at 06:45):

Lloyd McKenzie said:

So just the people, or people + locations (and timeframes)?

exactly.
Mostly important the first one, locations and timeframes will be optional.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (May 07 2020 at 06:46):

You'd probably need Encounter if you wanted at least a chance of capturing the others.

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 07 2020 at 06:49):

I'm thinking of Observations. Having a component for the person the patient had contact with as there is no valueReference. Location can be teh event-location Extension.

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 07 2020 at 06:51):

For Code i would go for: Personal Contact (Code C113393) from NCIT (couldn't find a better, license free code yet)

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 07 2020 at 06:54):

The scope in Encounter doesn't fit at all. But yes also looked at Encounter. Code then would go into Encounter.type.

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 07 2020 at 08:16):

structural Encounter fits better. So: ignore the scope and just go with encounter in this case?

view this post on Zulip Ward Weistra (May 07 2020 at 08:23):

@John Moehrke Is this you're looking for on Simplifier: https://simplifier.net/search?searchtype=Resources&category=Profile&corebasetype=Person&fhirVersion=R4 ?

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (May 07 2020 at 14:57):

@Ward Weistra yes... how did you get that? I think this is an absolutely essential feature for everyone about to write an IG...

view this post on Zulip Ward Weistra (May 07 2020 at 16:18):

@John Moehrke Just go to https://simplifier.net/search and:

  • Select Search Type > Resources
  • Select Resource Categories > Profiles
  • Now the Core Base Types selector appears, select the base resource of your choice (Person in this case)
  • Make additional optional selections, like FHIR version, etc.

view this post on Zulip Ward Weistra (May 07 2020 at 16:20):

https://registry.fhir.org has limited support for this at this point, but we will soon work with HL7 on bringing that to a similar level


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC