Stream: shorthand
Topic: Extension Warning
Jean Duteau (Jul 01 2020 at 00:12):
So I just did a silly thing on an extension definition:
Extension: blah
Id: blah
- extension.value[x] only CodeableConcept
Do you see it? I accidentally added extension in my first constraint. Obviously a user error, but I feel that a warning from SUSHI would be appropriate here because, without any other constraints, this probably isn't what the user really wanted.
Chris Moesel (Jul 01 2020 at 12:00):
Hmmm... so that is technically valid (essentially saying all sub-extensions must have CodeableConcept values), but I agree that it's almost always a mistake. So far we've only flagged "probably mistakes" in rare circumstances (the only one that comes to mind is when we changed extension syntax).
If we were to issue a warning, what would you suggest the condition be under which we issue the warning? Constraints on extension.* without a contains rule to declare sub-extensions?
Jean Duteau (Jul 01 2020 at 16:35):
Chris Moesel said:
If we were to issue a warning, what would you suggest the condition be under which we issue the warning? Constraints on
extension.*without acontainsrule to declare sub-extensions?
Yes, that is probably the condition. Did you actually mean to constrain extension.* when you didn't declare actual sub-extensions?
Chris Moesel (Jul 01 2020 at 16:40):
OK. I logged an issue so we can keep track of it, but we probably won't address it right away: https://github.com/FHIR/sushi/issues/514
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
