Stream: IPS
Topic: SNOMED CT Sub-Ontology to Support the IPS
Peter Jordan (Nov 26 2021 at 22:55):
David Hay (Nov 28 2021 at 20:56):
I thought this was already the case?
Peter Jordan (Nov 28 2021 at 22:02):
The IPS sub-set for non-member countries only has the SCTID, Active status, FSN and preferred (US English) term. It doesn't contain any of the relationships which provide the full value of the ontology.
Rob Hausam (Nov 29 2021 at 02:23):
Yes, it is interesting. And I wasn't aware that it was coming. The next question is, how should/can we use it - in the IPS IG(s) and more generally? We'll need to give this some thought.
Christof Gessner (Nov 29 2021 at 08:43):
I’d recommend to keep referencing the GPS, while embracing the new visibility of the IPS concepts as a GPS-component that can be developed, explained and curated as a separate entity.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
