Stream: IPS
Topic: IPS: Document Vs Library
Giorgio Cangioli (Sep 01 2019 at 15:59):
The IPS has been initially designed to be a document and if you look at its intended use the IPS is definitively “a document”…
However, most of the expectations around the IPS seem to be related to the set of common minimal non-exhaustive “building blocks” the IPS is composed of (the “IPS library”); that could be reused cross-domains and cross-jurisdictions.
Giorgio Cangioli (Sep 01 2019 at 15:59):
My impression is that currently there is still ambiguity in distinguishing between these two kinds of “IPS products”.
This applies not only to the FHIR (or CDA) IPS IGs, but also to the IPS dataset as described by the EN 17269 (and likely in the future IPS ISO standard).
Giorgio Cangioli (Sep 01 2019 at 15:59):
I hope we could start discussing soon (after the ballot ?) on how we should proceed to remove these ambiguities. In some future version of the FHIR IG we might for example create two layers of profiles: those directly used in the IPS FHIR document and those that represent in FHIR this set of minimal and non-exhaustive building blocks, potentially reusable beyond the IPS case. The same approach could be followed for the CEN (and future ISO) IPS dataset as well.
dr Kai U. Heitmann (Sep 01 2019 at 16:15):
Thanks Giorgio!
Sylvia Thun (Sep 01 2019 at 16:25):
:+1:🏻
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
