Stream: terminology / utg
Topic: UTG package Id
Grahame Grieve (Apr 08 2020 at 23:10):
The package id for UTG is currently hl7.other.uv.utg
I'm going to change it to hl7.terminology.
here's why:
- hl7 - HL7 publishes it
- terminology - that's what it is, and if we have terminology as a product family in it's own right, this will be it's main thing
- it's nice and simple for any users
Grahame Grieve (Apr 08 2020 at 23:13):
and because "utg" is an internal process name, not an meaningful name in any other context.
Grahame Grieve (Apr 08 2020 at 23:13):
though I could talked into hl7.tx
Vassil Peytchev (Apr 08 2020 at 23:46):
tx usually stands for transaction or transmission...
hl7.terminology is indeed nice and simple
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 09 2020 at 01:00):
the id name is driven by the naming standard the publisher demands
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 09 2020 at 01:01):
It used to be simpler...
Grahame Grieve (Apr 09 2020 at 01:31):
the publisher does demand some things, but in this case, this is simpler
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 09 2020 at 03:00):
Publisher is going to spit out a warning - your assertion is it's appropriate to suppress in this case?
Grahame Grieve (Apr 09 2020 at 03:32):
why will it be a warning?
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 09 2020 at 03:40):
Because that's what it spit out before we changed the id to what it currently is.
Frank Oemig (Apr 10 2020 at 06:55):
Is UTG the only product/package terminology provides?
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 10 2020 at 14:15):
It's the only 'shared' set of terminology artifacts. FHIR will define code systems for certain elements like status and gender which are locked to specific versions of the FHIR spec or IG because they use the 'code' data type. It'll also define lots of value sets where the value set is tightly bound to the model. I presume that v2 and CDA will do the same.
Ted Klein (Apr 10 2020 at 16:35):
I created the initial Google Doc for the FHIR content error from the UTG build, as requested. Here is the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12ri0qFzh6XuF_OBRNgg5oZ5YvMSUuDB8kANhEvrhdGQ/edit?usp=sharing
Ted Klein (Apr 10 2020 at 19:53):
Ok all the categorized errors from the UTG build of the FHIR content have been loaded into the Google Doc. Four categories - the additional one aat the end is a bad extension. The vast majority of the errors are the id/URL mismatch errors.
Ted Klein (Apr 15 2020 at 01:33):
@Grahame Grieve Perhaps I was confused, but I though you said the errors from the use of the R5 extension in NamingSystem resources was going to go away? = Extension url "http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-NamingSystem.url" is not valid (invalid Version "5.0")
NamingSystem/v3-PHOccupationCDCCensus2010: NamingSystem.extension[1].url (l8/c91) error URL value "http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-NamingSystem.url" does not resolve
Grahame Grieve (Apr 15 2020 at 01:44):
it is going to go away. I guess it will be next release of the IG Publisher
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
