Stream: terminology / utg
Topic: Remaining UTG errors
Grahame Grieve (Apr 14 2020 at 11:39):
I'm looking at the UTG errors. The normative extension exists on a number of code systems. There's a definitional problem associated with that extension but that extension should not exist in UTG. So proposed fixes:
-
CodeSystem/data-absent-reason - remove this from UTG; it's normative in the FHIR space (special case)
- same for CodeSystem/message-transport
- also CodeSystem/restful-security-service
-
CodeSystem/definition-use - remove the normative marker in UTG, and correct that it is wrongly labelled in the next R4 technical correction
And make the same changes in the matching value sets
Grahame Grieve (Apr 14 2020 at 11:39):
please let me know if you think those are the wrong things to do
Grahame Grieve (Apr 14 2020 at 11:40):
@Ted Klein I'm leaving the v2 issues to you
Grahame Grieve (Apr 14 2020 at 11:40):
and the v3 ones
Ted Klein (Apr 14 2020 at 12:15):
Thanks I will examine and deal with these today.
Ted Klein (Apr 14 2020 at 19:23):
Yes this is perfect now, there errors will be gone as soon as I do a PUSH. Thanks.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
