Stream: trifolia-on-fhir
Topic: build errors --jurisdiction
Robert Dieterle (Jul 21 2020 at 19:54):
@Sean McIlvenna @Grahame Grieve I am creating a FHIR IG on Trifilia. When I build it with 0.97 of the publisher I do not get Jurisdiction errors. Any of the more recent versions of the publish have judication errors for both the IG and all of the resources (profiles). What do I need to do to make this stop with a current version of the publisher? Package ID is hl7.fhir.us.dme-orders and IG is post-acute-orders4 (btw I am trying to explore/resolve errors with a limited version of the IG post-acute-orders-and-referrals.
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:33):
In ToF, for the ImplementationGuide, you can go to Browse/Edit > Edit Implementation Guide > Other (tab) and there is an option for "Jursidiction(s)" just below the "package-list.json" section.
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:34):
However, in this particular case, I believe you are getting that error because you need to specify the HL7 working group of your IG.
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:35):
When you have a package id that starts with "hl7." you are required to specify the WG that is responsible for your IG
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:35):
Just below and to the left of the "package id" field is the "Working Group" field
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:35):
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:37):
oh but wait.. no, the "working group" is probably not your issue the more I think about it
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:37):
hmmm, I'm not sure why the IG publisher would be giving you grief about the jursidiction
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:37):
But, I know ToF allows you to edit Jursidiction in the "Other" tab of ImplementationGuide and Profile resources
Grahame Grieve (Jul 21 2020 at 21:39):
well, I don't know what the actual error is, but the IG publisher now requires that realm specific IGs specify the realm in the jurisdiction, so that you can find realm specific IGs on registry.fhir.org
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:40):
Ahh! didn't realize that.
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:41):
So, @Grahame Grieve , should a jurisdiction code just be (for example) "us"
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:41):
or "US"
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:42):
or "eu"?
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 21 2020 at 21:42):
tried to look at the expansion of the suggested valueset for Jursidiction, but it says
Unable to provide support for code system urn:iso:std:iso:3166:-2
Robert Dieterle (Jul 21 2020 at 21:44):
I believe that 3166:-2 is USA but 3166:-1 is US -- neither seem to work as the code for jurisdiction in a resource structure definition
Grahame Grieve (Jul 21 2020 at 21:48):
US
Grahame Grieve (Jul 21 2020 at 21:50):
{
"coding" : [{
"system" : "urn:iso:std:iso:3166",
"code" : "US"
}]
}
Sean McIlvenna (Jul 22 2020 at 16:44):
@Grahame Grieve where did you get that "coding" from? Can you point me to whatever expansion of that valueset you're looking at?
Igor Sirkovich (Jul 25 2020 at 23:12):
The expansion on https://hl7.org/fhir/valueset-jurisdiction.html doesn't seem to work, but I believe this code is available at the expansion of https://hl7.org/fhir/valueset-iso3166-1-2.html
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
