Stream: JIRA/Confluence
Topic: technical cleanup
John Moehrke (Aug 05 2020 at 02:33):
I have a JIRA CR that is simple administrative cleanup. It should not require a workgroup vote as the workgroup is not going to add any review or value. How do I mark that a CR is a cleanup. Much like a spelling correction, but in this case it is a cleanup of valueSet administration
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 05 2020 at 02:56):
If it's truly a technical correction (spelling, grammar, formatting, tooling issue, broken link, failure to change a name in one place when it was changed elsewhere, etc.) then you can 'move' it to be a Technical Correction - if it wasn't negative balloted. Otherwise, it'll have to stay a Change Request and will have to be voted - though you can include it in a block vote.
John Moehrke (Aug 05 2020 at 12:34):
In this case. We have been including in the FHIR core some valueSets that DICOM has published. So the CP is to move from using local valueSet resources in the FHIR core, to using by reference to URI of the valueSets published by DICOM. So there is no functional change, and it sets us up to be following any changes they make to their own valueSets. Hence why I am not thinking there is any value to having the workgroup vote.
See J#24908
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 05 2020 at 22:16):
Yup, that would fall under Technical Correction if it doesn't change the URI of the code systems and doesn't change what codes are allowed (i.e. no implementer impact)
John Moehrke (Aug 06 2020 at 13:14):
okay, then I will move this forward as a technical correction. thanks
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
