Stream: JIRA/Confluence
Topic: HL7 STU Comments
Alexander Kiel (Dec 03 2019 at 15:15):
The HL7 STU Comments are not moved to JIRA?
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 03 2019 at 17:26):
There shouldn't be any STU comments captured there for anything FHIR. That's not an accepted feedback mechanism for FHIR artifacts. Doing a quick scan, I don't see any FHIR artifacts that have feedback there. @Lynn Laakso, is there any way to ensure that FHIR IG STUs aren't even shown on that site?
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 03 2019 at 17:31):
Looks like CQL does have comments. @Bryn Rhodes, you should figure out what you want to do with those.
Lynn Laakso (Dec 03 2019 at 17:34):
If I suppress the STU comments I might also suppress the link to the STU which holds the URL of the standard...
Alexander Kiel (Dec 04 2019 at 19:30):
@Lloyd McKenzie I was referring to CQL Comments. I should have mentioned it.
Bryn Rhodes (Dec 05 2019 at 04:19):
@Lloyd McKenzie , I'd be happy to move the CQL STU comments to JIRA. Is there some process already established for importing the results of an STU comment export?
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 05 2019 at 05:01):
Nope. And there's a ton of metadata you'd need to add before the imports would be treated as valid (e.g. what spec, what work group, type of comment, what artifact/page, etc.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
