Stream: inferno
Topic: Provenance Logic
Chris Whitesell (Apr 08 2022 at 13:15):
Hey All,
For the Provenance portion of Bulk/Multi-Patient tests, there seem to be 2 sets of calls being made: AllergyIntolerance and CarePlan. All of the relevant scenarios are contained in the AllergyIntolerance responses, and all required elements are being sent. The CarePlan set contains a single response, which happens to be a Practitioner and thus includes the required agent.onBehalfOf element. The test fails because there is not also an example of agent.type.coding.code:transmitter in the CarePlan response, despite being contained in the relevant AllergyIntolerance responses. Should the test pass given the required scenarios/elements are contained within the full set of responses, or is it intended to assess the subsets distinctly?
Nathan Loyer (Apr 11 2022 at 14:44):
@Yunwei Wang or @Stephen MacVicar could you take a look at this today?
Yunwei Wang (Apr 11 2022 at 17:27):
@Nathan Loyer I am looking at that. It looks like a logic in our code. Would you mind to create a GitHub issue?
Nathan Loyer (Apr 11 2022 at 17:28):
thanks, will do
Nathan Loyer (Apr 11 2022 at 17:29):
https://github.com/onc-healthit/onc-certification-g10-test-kit/issues/86
Stephen MacVicar (Apr 11 2022 at 17:59):
Do you see the same error in 1.9? The logic appears to be the same in the new version.
Chris Whitesell (Apr 12 2022 at 12:46):
nope, it passes successfully in 1.9
Yunwei Wang (Apr 12 2022 at 14:14):
We have identified the problem but we don't have bandwidth to put the fix into this upcoming release. We will have it in the next (May) release.
Nathan Loyer (Apr 12 2022 at 15:32):
that would be great @Yunwei Wang thanks!
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
