FHIR Chat · Da Vinci Notifications Block Vote 6 · Da Vinci

Stream: Da Vinci

Topic: Da Vinci Notifications Block Vote 6

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (May 14 2020 at 22:53):

Tentative Block Vote 6 planned for May 21 INM Conference Call:

Let me know if you would like to pull an item out to discuss. You will get another opportunity on the call to remove an item.

Jira Issue Summary (Reporter) Resolution

  1. J#26209 Device in MessageHeader, (nradov) Persuasive with Modification
  2. J#26132 Unsolicted notifications should be limited to defined use cases and triggers, (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  3. J#26131 Need to reference Da Vinci Guiding Principles soemwhere in IG that is consistent across all other Da Vinci ballots , (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  4. J#26130 Shoud not have two ways of doing something. , (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  5. J#26129 How is the intermediary going to determine what to remove1?, (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  6. J#26127 add link, (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  7. J#26126 add versions, (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive
  8. J#26124 Providers should not be required to provide the precise reason for missing data, (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  9. J#26121 Is there a possibility for manual review so that sensitive data is not shared? , (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  10. J#26117 Contract agreement to establish triggering event , (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive
  11. J#26116 Many things create encounters from Admission Discharge Scenarios , (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  12. J#26114 Add Guiding Primciples to IG, (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification

Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC


An HL7 Website -