Stream: Da Vinci
Topic: Da Vinci Notifications Block Vote 5
Eric Haas (Apr 22 2020 at 00:03):
Tentative Block Vote 5 planned for May 7 INM Conference Call:
Let me know if you would like to pull an item out to discuss. You will get another opportunity on the call to remove an item.
Issue key Summary (Reporter) Resolution
- J#26909 Add transfers as a use case (ehaas) Persuasive
- J#26285 Provide guidance for error handling (seanmcilvenna) Persuasive
- J#26224 The text seems duplicated. Does it make sense to be in this section? (rquintano) Persuasive with Modification
- J#26220 "What consists a ""complex content""?" (rquintano) Persuasive with Modification
- J#26216 Follow FAST security guidelines (nradov) Considered for Future Use
- J#26212 New IG for messaging fundamentals (nradov) Considered for Future Use
- J#26211 Endpoint in message Bundle (nradov) Not Persuasive
- J#26208 Single Notification for fetal surgery patients (nradov) Considered - Question answered
- J#26195 Sensitive data should only be exchanged over secured channels (pknapp) Persuasive with Modification
- J#26192 Clarification required (pknapp) Considered - No action required
- J#26178 ValueSet Tree Holes (ginocanessa) Not Persuasive with Modification
- J#26164 Add Section on batch transactions and bulk data (ehaas) Considered for Future Use
- J#26156 make timestamp mandatory (craig.newman) Persuasive
- J#26147 fix labels (craig.newman) Persuasive
- J#26139 Security for sender sending endpoint (Isaac.Vetter) Persuasive with Modification
- J#26135 Flesh out the Security page. Use SMART Backend Services. (Isaac.Vetter) Considered for Future Use
- J#26134 Use SMART Backend Services. (Isaac.Vetter) Persuasive with Modification
- J#26106 immature resources (Brian_Pech) Persuasive with Modification
- J#26103 Why Messaging1? (Brian_Pech) Persuasive with Modification
- J#26098 Why Messaging? (vassil) Persuasive with Modification
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
