FHIR Chat · Da Vinci Notifications Agendas · Da Vinci

Stream: Da Vinci

Topic: Da Vinci Notifications Agendas

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Apr 07 2020 at 17:15):

Trackers to discuss on this week's Wednesdays at 12pm Eastern Da Vinci Notifications call:

Jira Issue Summary (Reporter) Proposed Resolution

  1. J#26182 Question: Out Of Scope: What is a trigger (ginocanessa) Considered - Question answered
  2. J#26175 Reliable Delivery heading does not discuss the topic. (ginocanessa) Persuasive with Modification
  3. J#26161 fix the summaries or remove since not commplete (ehaas)
  4. J#26159 clarify must support rules1 (emmanurse)
  5. J#26138 What's the author field good for? (Isaac.Vetter) Not Persuasive with Modification
  6. J#26130 Shoud not have two ways of doing something. (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive with Modification
  7. J#26119 Multiple ways to create a message is not ideal (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  8. J#26117 Contract agreement to establish triggering event (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive
  9. J#26116 Many things create encounters from Admission Discharge Scenarios (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  10. J#26098 Why Messaging? (vassil) Not Persuasive

view this post on Zulip Vassil Peytchev (Apr 09 2020 at 19:19):

I apologize for not seeing this in time. Is it possible for me to give some more background to FHIR#26098 next week?

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Apr 09 2020 at 22:00):

yes ... but if your goal is for us to remove messaging from the guide which currently what the guide is 90% + about we are not going to do that for this version... I think there is a golden opportunity in the future to include R4 backported Subscriptions and provide a bridge to R5 subscriptions.

view this post on Zulip Vassil Peytchev (Apr 09 2020 at 22:13):

No, my goal is to provide more background on my vote to inform future versions. Thanks, I have next week's meeting on my calendar.

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Apr 13 2020 at 22:35):

Trackers to discuss on this week's Wednesdays at 12pm Eastern Da Vinci Notifications call:

Issue key Summary (Reporter)

  1. J#26175 Reliable Delivery heading does not discuss the topic. (ginocanessa)
  2. J#26130 Shoud not have two ways of doing something. (celine_lefebvre)
  3. J#26119 Multiple ways to create a message is not ideal (celine_lefebvre)
  4. J#26117 Contract agreement to establish triggering event (celine_lefebvre)
  5. J#26116 Many things create encounters from Admission Discharge Scenarios (celine_lefebvre)
  6. J#26098 Why Messaging? (vassil) @Vassil Peytchev

Also Discuss adding the transfer use case

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Apr 20 2020 at 18:18):

Trackers to discuss on this week's Wednesdays at 12pm Eastern Da Vinci Notifications call:

Also update on adding the transfer use case...

Issue key Summary (Reporter) Proposed disposition

  1. J#26201 open loop process1 (klsalzman) Not Persuasive with Modification
  2. J#26200 open loop process (klsalzman) ****
  3. J#26199 Message Bundles2 (klsalzman) Considered - No action required
  4. J#26175 Reliable Delivery heading does not discuss the topic. (ginocanessa) Persuasive with Modification
  5. J#26133 Future Potencial Scenarios to be ballotted? (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  6. J#26132 Unsolicted notifications should be limited to defined use cases and triggers (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  7. J#26131 Need to reference Da Vinci Guiding Principles soemwhere in IG that is consistent across all other Da Vinci ballots (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  8. J#26130 Shoud not have two ways of doing something. (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  9. J#26129 How is the intermediary going to determine what to remove1? (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  10. J#26127 add link (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  11. J#26126 add versions (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive with Modification
  12. J#26125 do not require providers to include nullflavors (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive
  13. J#26124 Providers should not be required to provide the precise reason for missing data (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive
  14. J#26122 fix typo (celine_lefebvre) ****
  15. J#26121 Is there a possibility for manual review so that sensitive data is not shared? (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  16. J#26119 Multiple ways to create a message is not ideal (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  17. J#26118 Protection of sensitive data? (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive
  18. J#26117 Contract agreement to establish triggering event (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive
  19. J#26116 Many things create encounters from Admission Discharge Scenarios (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  20. J#26115 Triggers should not be out of scope (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  21. J#26114 Add Guiding Primciples to IG (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Apr 22 2020 at 15:52):

UPDATED TO MARK DUPLICATES

Trackers to discuss on this week's Wednesdays at 12pm Eastern Da Vinci Notifications call:

Also update on adding the transfer use case...

Issue key Summary (Reporter) Proposed disposition

  1. J#26201 open loop process1 (klsalzman) Not Persuasive with Modification
  2. J#26200 open loop process (klsalzman) ****
  3. J#26199 Message Bundles2 (klsalzman) Considered - No action required
  4. J#26175 Reliable Delivery heading does not discuss the topic. (ginocanessa) duplicate
  5. J#26133 Future Potencial Scenarios to be ballotted? (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  6. J#26132 Unsolicted notifications should be limited to defined use cases and triggers (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  7. J#26131 Need to reference Da Vinci Guiding Principles soemwhere in IG that is consistent across all other Da Vinci ballots (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  8. J#26130 Shoud not have two ways of doing something. (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  9. J#26129 How is the intermediary going to determine what to remove1? (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  10. J#26127 add link (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  11. J#26126 add versions (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive with Modification
  12. J#26125 do not require providers to include nullflavors (celine_lefebvre) duplicate
  13. J#26124 Providers should not be required to provide the precise reason for missing data (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive
  14. J#26122 fix typo (celine_lefebvre) ****
  15. J#26121 Is there a possibility for manual review so that sensitive data is not shared? (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  16. J#26119 Multiple ways to create a message is not ideal (celine_lefebvre) duplicate
  17. J#26118 Protection of sensitive data? (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive
  18. J#26117 Contract agreement to establish triggering event (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive
  19. J#26116 Many things create encounters from Admission Discharge Scenarios (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  20. J#26115 Triggers should not be out of scope (celine_lefebvre) duplicate
  21. J#26114 Add Guiding Primciples to IG (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Apr 27 2020 at 22:53):

Trackers to discuss on this week's Wednesdays at 12pm Eastern Da Vinci Notifications call:

Jira Issue Summary (Reporter) Resolution

  1. J#26132 Unsolicted notifications should be limited to defined use cases and triggers (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive
  2. J#26131 Need to reference Da Vinci Guiding Principles soemwhere in IG that is consistent across all other Da Vinci ballots (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  3. J#26130 Shoud not have two ways of doing something. (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  4. J#26129 How is the intermediary going to determine what to remove1? (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  5. J#26127 add link (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  6. J#26126 add versions (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive with Modification
  7. J#26124 Providers should not be required to provide the precise reason for missing data (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive
  8. J#26121 Is there a possibility for manual review so that sensitive data is not shared? (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  9. J#26118 Protection of sensitive data? (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive
  10. J#26117 Contract agreement to establish triggering event (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive
  11. J#26116 Many things create encounters from Admission Discharge Scenarios (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  12. J#26114 Add Guiding Primciples to IG (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Apr 29 2020 at 22:16):

Trackers to discuss on next week's Wednesday May 6 at 12pm Eastern Da Vinci Notifications call:

Jira Issue Summary (Reporter) Resolution

  1. J#26124 Providers should not be required to provide the precise reason for missing data (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive
  2. J#26121 Is there a possibility for manual review so that sensitive data is not shared? (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  3. J#26118 Protection of sensitive data? (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive
  4. J#26117 Contract agreement to establish triggering event (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive
  5. J#26116 Many things create encounters from Admission Discharge Scenarios (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (May 06 2020 at 22:52):

Trackers to discuss on next week's Wednesday May 13 at 12pm Eastern Da Vinci Notifications call:

Jira Issue Summary (Reporter) Resolution

  1. J#26121 Is there a possibility for manual review so that sensitive data is not shared? (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification
  2. J#26118 Protection of sensitive data? (celine_lefebvre) Not Persuasive
  3. J#26117 Contract agreement to establish triggering event (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive
  4. J#26116 Many things create encounters from Admission Discharge Scenarios (celine_lefebvre) Persuasive with Modification

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (May 15 2020 at 00:02):

Trackers to discuss on next week's Wednesday May 30 at 12pm Eastern Da Vinci Notifications call:

Jira Issue Summary (Reporter) Resolution

  1. J#26201 open loop process1 (klsalzman) Not Persuasive with Modification
  2. J#26200 open loop process (klsalzman) ****
  3. J#26199 Message Bundles2 (klsalzman) Considered - No action required
  4. J#26182 Question: Out Of Scope: What is a trigger (ginocanessa) Persuasive with Modification
  5. J#26177 Forwarding Content Question (ginocanessa) Considered - Question answered
  6. J#26173 Question on Bundle Size (ginocanessa) ****
  7. J#26153 is the HRex Coverage Profile still necessary (craig.newman) ****
  8. J#26148 clarify intermediary role(s)2 (craig.newman) ****
  9. J#26143 clarify intermediary role(s) (craig.newman) ****
  10. J#26105 vague response (Brian_Pech) Not Persuasive

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Jun 03 2020 at 16:05):

Trackers to discuss on next week's Wednesday June 3 at 12pm Eastern Da Vinci Notifications call:

  1. J#26177 Forwarding Content Question (ginocanessa) Considered - Question answered
  2. J#26173 Question on Bundle Size (ginocanessa) ****
  3. J#26153 is the HRex Coverage Profile still necessary (craig.newman) ****
  4. J#26148 clarify intermediary role(s)2 (craig.newman) ****
  5. J#26143 clarify intermediary role(s) (craig.newman) ****
  6. J#26105 vague response (Brian_Pech) Not Persuasive

Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC


An HL7 Website -