FHIR Chat · DEQM - MRP cql · Da Vinci

Stream: Da Vinci

Topic: DEQM - MRP cql


view this post on Zulip Linda (Aug 15 2018 at 15:27):

Bryn, Anne and I met last night and created the cql for the MRP use case. From Bryn

view this post on Zulip Linda (Aug 15 2018 at 15:27):

here is a link to the source CQL for the measure:

http://build.fhir.org/ig/cqframework/hedis-ig/cql/stu3/mrp-logic.cql.html

So the canonical for the Measure at this point is a little different than what I thought it would be, so it's:

http://hl7.org/fhir/ig/hedis/Measure/measure-mrp

And you can see the complete data requirements in the Library resource here:

http://build.fhir.org/ig/cqframework/hedis-ig/Library-library-mrp-logic.xml.html

Note that they specify the profile, as well as code and date filters wherever possible.

view this post on Zulip Linda (Aug 15 2018 at 15:28):

Additionally based on this we made two changes to the resources

view this post on Zulip Linda (Aug 15 2018 at 15:30):

for Observation>status - added a comment to also process status of amended and corrected.

view this post on Zulip Linda (Aug 15 2018 at 15:33):

for Practitioner, Anne felt we need a list of qualified providers to do this so we are using DEQM Practitioner>Qualification>code and there will be a value set for the types that meet the requirement. To do this, we had to change the binding to the Qualification>code to use the code set specified as an example but change binding to required, i.e. Binding: v2 table 0360, Version 2.7 (required)

view this post on Zulip Linda (Aug 15 2018 at 15:35):

Note that we did NOT change qualification to a required element. Receivers of the data can decide if they need that field for processing the measure or have other ways to obtain that concept within their system.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC