FHIR Chat · N security-labels valueset · fhir/infrastructure-wg

Stream: fhir/infrastructure-wg

Topic: N security-labels valueset


view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (Apr 26 2021 at 19:21):

Why is the security-labels valueset Normative? Why is it owned by FHIR-I? What does it mean for a valueSet to be normative? Security, who thought we owned this valueSet, are noticing quite a few missing valuesets within this grouping valueset.

view this post on Zulip Gino Canessa (Apr 26 2021 at 19:45):

General consensus is: most likely that should be owned by Security; most likely it should not be normative. That said, could you please file tickets for these issues? Thanks!

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 26 2021 at 20:46):

Reason it's normative is that Resource.meta is normative. Whether and if we can roll that back will be an interesting conversation...

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (Apr 27 2021 at 10:57):

what is the meaning of a normative valueset? Is it not allowed to evolve?

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Apr 27 2021 at 13:31):

http://build.fhir.org/versions.html#f-compat


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC