Stream: fhir/infrastructure-wg
Topic: List maturity
John Moehrke (Dec 19 2019 at 21:55):
What is the plan for List resource maturity? It seems very low given the useses.
Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 22:00):
what use cases do you see? Maturity is driven by adoption, it hasn't been great...
John Moehrke (Dec 19 2019 at 22:07):
oh, that is unfortunate to hear... So IHE uses List in MHD to represent Folders in the Document Sharing world. And I want to switch away from DocumentManifest to have another kind of List (need flavors of list).
John Moehrke (Dec 19 2019 at 22:08):
It is also used in IHE for reconcilled lists of medications, allergies, and problems
John Moehrke (Dec 19 2019 at 22:08):
which I understood is a recommendation in the FHIR core
Bryn Rhodes (Dec 19 2019 at 22:18):
Quality reporting uses it extensively in communicating measure results.
Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 22:20):
@John Moehrke in IHE context, how much usage contributes to FMM assessment for list?
Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 22:21):
Same question for @Bryn Rhodes
John Moehrke (Dec 19 2019 at 22:23):
well List is FMM 1 today... I am wondering how IHE can provide evidence that it should progress to Normative in R5
Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 22:25):
provide documented evidence - in the form of an email to FHIR-I co-chairs - that the IHE community use meets any of the criteria specified for maturity levels in the spec
Bryn Rhodes (Dec 19 2019 at 22:27):
Actually that's a good point, I've never reported maturity results for List, but we've used it in every one of the Clinical Reasoning tracks, it's just always part of a MeasureReport.
Bryn Rhodes (Dec 19 2019 at 22:33):
Would FMG accept retroactive reporting of those results?
Grahame Grieve (Dec 19 2019 at 22:34):
well, we're not going to retrospectively update the FMM level, but all such reports are retrospective by their nature
John Moehrke (Dec 19 2019 at 22:35):
okay, IHE can provide our annual report from IHE Connectathons.
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 20 2019 at 00:02):
The trick to jumping to normative would be "evaluated across full range of use-cases". It's intended for use in allergy lists, problem lists and that sort of thing, but the evaluation so far has been "don't use it". I wouldn't want it locked down until we're confident in its suitability for those use-cases.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
