FHIR Chat · GF#22694 · fhir/infrastructure-wg

Stream: fhir/infrastructure-wg

Topic: GF#22694


view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Sep 24 2019 at 14:59):

RE GF#22694 the resolution says nothing about n R4 standard extension but we surely could use one now. See this argonaut tracker. Can I apply this and if we created a standard extension for R4 when would that be usable?

view this post on Zulip Ewout Kramer (Sep 24 2019 at 21:08):

I am usually doing this: https://www.hl7.org/fhir/versions.html#extensions, but then for a future version ;-)

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Sep 25 2019 at 16:02):

so http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-CapablilityStatement.acceptLanguage assuming the R5 is correct and will work on the CI build...

view this post on Zulip Ewout Kramer (Sep 25 2019 at 16:37):

Yes, that's what I would do. Though @Grahame Grieve I think has told me that we're bending the rules a bit here.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Sep 25 2019 at 19:18):

I think I said I still didn't have it set up. It will be a thing I work on once the technical correction is out


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC