FHIR Chat · GF#15091 identifiers · fhir/infrastructure-wg

Stream: fhir/infrastructure-wg

Topic: GF#15091 identifiers


view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 26 2018 at 05:14):

What, if anything, is the change needed in association with GF#15091 ?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 26 2018 at 05:14):

I think it should be resolved - no change

view this post on Zulip Michel Rutten (Jul 26 2018 at 08:18):

The issue details proposes:

The descriptions of these fields should be updated and the cardinality changed to '0..*'.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 26 2018 at 09:26):

and we did not agree to that

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Jul 26 2018 at 12:52):

It can't be Resolved No Change unless we also change the resolution to Not Persuasive - which I'm ok with

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 26 2018 at 13:01):

that would require us to reopen it?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Jul 26 2018 at 13:04):

If I'm recategorizing the resolution but not changing the outcome, I just add a comment explaining what I'm doing and make the change. It's not change the WG's expectation for change.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Jul 26 2018 at 13:04):

(or lack thereof...)


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC