Stream: fhir/infrastructure-wg
Topic: GF#14962: Questionnaire Invariants
Grahame Grieve (Jul 02 2018 at 22:59):
I think that the disposition for GF#14962 is wrong (even though I moved it). The intent of the disposition is that the item related invariants on Questionnaire apply to nested items - yes, that makes sense. But the disposition says that they should be applied to .repeat(item) - but that doesn't make sense. They are part of the element definition for Questionnaire.item (not Questionnaire.repeat(item), which is not an element) and automatically apply to all nested items, since they are @Questionnaire.item
Lloyd McKenzie (Jul 02 2018 at 23:07):
There's a separate tracker that talked about splitting referenced elements to be contained structure definitions so we could differentiate between constraints that apply to the element vs. those that apply to the type - given that invariants could be either. Don't remember where that landed.
Lloyd McKenzie (Jul 02 2018 at 23:07):
I think the submitter's comment was that the invariant wasn't being enforced by the tooling as it stands
Grahame Grieve (Jul 02 2018 at 23:09):
we didn't at on the other tracker; we said instead that profiles don't use contentReference. I applied that a few hours ago.
Grahame Grieve (Jul 02 2018 at 23:09):
I'll make sure that the tooling enforces them correctly
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
