Stream: fhir/infrastructure-wg
Topic: GF#14495: OperationOutcome use
Grahame Grieve (Jul 22 2018 at 07:45):
we need to revisit GF#14495 - the situation has transformed since the disposition, and I don't believe that it makes any sense now. @Ewout Kramer
Ewout Kramer (Jul 23 2018 at 11:29):
In which way? I think what we're saying is that for non 2xx codes you need an OperationOutcome (must admit I don't recall the discussion anymore).
Grahame Grieve (Jul 23 2018 at 11:34):
well, the narrow disposition relates to async, but that's been rewritten since, and I'm not even sure what it's trying to say
Ewout Kramer (Jul 23 2018 at 11:37):
You want to discuss it tonight? (tomorrow morning for you)?
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
