FHIR Chat · FHIR-I Wed Q2 · fhir/infrastructure-wg

Stream: fhir/infrastructure-wg

Topic: FHIR-I Wed Q2


view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 15:13):

Discuss GF#17833
Josh Mandel/Michel Rutten: 11-0-0

Discuss GF#19280

view this post on Zulip Michael Donnelly (Oct 03 2018 at 15:14):

It looks like the descriptive text for Deprecated in 2.7.0.1 The Standards Development Process is copied from the line above. I made a tracker for this with proposed wording: https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=19280
Is this something we should discuss in person?

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 15:24):

Josh Mandel/Michael Donnelly: 11-0-0

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 15:25):

Discuss GF#17776

view this post on Zulip Michael Donnelly (Oct 03 2018 at 15:27):

Discuss GF#17776

This immediately made me think of https://www.sbnation.com/a/17776-football

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 15:29):

Christiaan Knaap/Brian Reinhold: 11-0-0

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 15:29):

Discuss GF#17865

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 15:35):

Discuss GF#17889

Josh Mandel/Richard Ettema: 11-0-0

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 15:45):

Discuss GF#18253

Christiaan Knaap/Josh Mandel: 10-0-2

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 15:50):

Discuss GF#17742

Josh Mandel/Michael Donnelly: 12-0-0

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 15:56):

Discuss GF#17697
Christiaan Knaap/Josh Mandel: 11-0-1

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 16:06):

Discuss GF#17696
Ewout Kramer/Brian Reinhold: 11-0-1

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 16:19):

Discuss GF#17672

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 16:23):

Ewout Kramer/Michael Donnelly: 12-0-0

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 16:23):

Discuss GF#17660

view this post on Zulip Josh Mandel (Oct 03 2018 at 16:29):

Michel Rutten/Ewout Kramer: 8-0-4

view this post on Zulip Christiaan Knaap (Oct 03 2018 at 16:40):

Searchparameter Device.udi-carrier references an element of type base64Binary.
At least, in R3 it had the expression "Device.udi.carrierHRF | Device.udi.carrierAIDC"
In the definitions.json from the 2018Sep ballot it lacks an expression. But the description still states it points to carrierAIDC.

btw, Device-udi-di also lacks an expression.

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Oct 03 2018 at 16:55):

@Christiaan Knaap is this directed at Device or the Datatype? Device is Orders and Observations

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Oct 03 2018 at 17:18):

@Eric Haas this came from a question I asked @Christiaan Knaap where I claimed that there was no search parameters on base64Binary and he claimed that there was.

so there is. The question is, what does that mean. In this case, I'm going to make a task suggesting that this parameter is wrong

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Oct 03 2018 at 17:21):

GF#19288

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Oct 03 2018 at 17:22):

this will come up when I process FHIR-I tasks and do QA, so OO should get to it in the next few weeks

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Oct 03 2018 at 19:42):

@Jose Costa Teixeira FYI


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC