Stream: fhir/infrastructure-wg
Topic: DAR with coded elements
Eric Haas (Mar 28 2019 at 19:35):
A couple of chats have surfaced an issue with the interpretation of binding and DAR and real world implementability.
- https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179175-argonaut
- https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179166-implementers/topic/Aligning.20with.20FHIR.20resource.20states
bottom line is if we accept Lloyd's assertion whether factually correct or not - it removes an important mechanism if the data is simply not there. I would like to discuss further on the fhir-I call (unless MnM more appropriate).
Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 28 2019 at 19:58):
MnM's probably more appropriate, but we'll get more people on FHIR-I
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC