Stream: fhir/infrastructure-wg
Topic: Close up
Grahame Grieve (Aug 07 2018 at 12:34):
Do we want to try and find time for GF#14245?
Grahame Grieve (Aug 07 2018 at 12:38):
and we are remiss not to have discussed GF#13216 but this really feels like a face to face discussino
Brian Postlethwaite (Aug 07 2018 at 12:41):
I agree, face to face would be far better for this one, and I agree with your notes on it, especially the great example.
Grahame Grieve (Aug 07 2018 at 12:50):
GF#17538 - this looks like we should do it as a technical correction
Grahame Grieve (Aug 07 2018 at 12:51):
so does GF#17489 - definite technical correction we shoud apply now
Grahame Grieve (Aug 07 2018 at 12:56):
ok i've reviewed all the tasks. Just the open ones here or already scheduled for the call on Friday
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 07 2018 at 14:07):
17489 can't be a technical correction as it's a substantive change that isn't a clear error. But we can vote on it quickly. 17538 has been auto-approved. What can we do with 13216 now such that it's not going to cause issues at ballot and such that any changes we make after Friday can be non-substantive?
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 07 2018 at 14:09):
My recommendation is to:
- add a SHOULD NOT on adding parameters to a search result other than _count
- add a SHALL declare any added parameters into the SELF link
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 07 2018 at 14:10):
Also add SHALL check the self link and guidance on the importance of using certain search parameters like Patient.active
Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 07 2018 at 14:10):
(including the issue of missing data)
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
