Stream: fhir/infrastructure-wg
Topic: Call agenda
Josh Mandel (Aug 31 2020 at 20:58):
I'd like to add FHIR#28407 to the agenda for our next call.
Grahame Grieve (Aug 31 2020 at 20:59):
I'd like to take up the package related questions at the next FHIR-I call too:
Grahame Grieve (Aug 31 2020 at 20:59):
Grahame Grieve (Sep 01 2020 at 13:38):
FYI: https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179177-conformance/topic/Must-Support.20and.20element.20values
Josh Mandel (Oct 06 2021 at 20:37):
For our next call I have a few wrap-up issues on the SMART spec:
- https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-33662
- https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-34081
- https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-33249
Marti Velezis (Oct 12 2021 at 21:52):
Can I request an agenda item for 10/18 to discuss whether change to: http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/identifier-type should be done in FHIR core or part of a UTG request? We would like to add some additional values (as noted in https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-31750) . @Rob Hausam
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 13 2021 at 02:25):
Identifier is actually owned by MnM, so OO approving the request is actually out-of-order. I've re-opened on that basis.
UDI is an identifier "system" - i.e. it is already a unique kind of identifier. Identifier.type is used to establish generic classes of identifiers that could come from multiple systems. We specifically (and intentionally) excluded all of the v2 codes that referred to identifier systems.
Marti Velezis (Oct 13 2021 at 03:04):
@Lloyd McKenzie thanks for responding and reopening -- not sure how to address our requirement , but are you also suggesting that this is not a FHIR-I conversation? Do we need to bring attend MnM to discuss? As the types we are suggesting many not fit the UDI as they are not unique identifiers, but type/kind identifiers. Please advise where the discussion belongs. Thx. Marti
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 13 2021 at 14:36):
@Marti Velezis Yes, it'll be an MnM discussion.
Gino Canessa (Oct 18 2021 at 15:40):
Hello all, for today's call (October 18), would it be possible to add FHIR-34132 to the agenda? Thanks!
Josh Mandel (Oct 18 2021 at 18:24):
@FHIR-I Co-chairs For next week (10/25) we'll plan to bring publication requests for SMART App Launch and for Bulk Data.
Brett Marquard (Oct 19 2021 at 18:31):
We collectively noticed the ballot recon spreadsheets are not posted for Bulk or SMART App Launch...Do any of the @FHIR-I Co-chairs mind if we post? (we = @Josh Mandel or me).
Brett Marquard (Oct 19 2021 at 18:31):
Both already 'passed', but I know we must post before publication.
Brett Marquard (Oct 19 2021 at 18:31):
Brett Marquard (Oct 19 2021 at 18:32):
(number way left is 'Affirmatives', number way right is minimum number to pass)
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 19 2021 at 18:48):
No concerns
Josh Mandel (Oct 25 2021 at 17:53):
Also for agenda today: FHIR-34170 incorporating feedback from @Bas van den Heuvel QA (thanks Bas!!)
Kenneth Myhra (Oct 25 2021 at 19:04):
I'm waiting in the lobby for todays meeting. Is the meeting still on?
Josh Mandel (Oct 25 2021 at 19:04):
@FHIR-I Co-chairs
Gino Canessa (Nov 01 2021 at 17:27):
Happy Monday! Was wondering if we could add FHIR-34211 to the agenda for today please. Thanks!
Yunwei Wang (Nov 01 2021 at 18:12):
sure!
Kenneth Myhra (Nov 01 2021 at 18:52):
Maybe we could take a look at these as well FHIR-33256 and FHIR-33232
Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 13 2021 at 21:05):
FHIR#34306 is a candidate R4B change
Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 13 2021 at 21:06):
(so would be nice to tackle on Monday)
Josh Mandel (Nov 13 2021 at 22:11):
Thanks -- added a note on the issue (want to understand why it's relevant/urgent for R4B).
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC