FHIR Chat · 2018-05 Köln Thursday Q3 · fhir/infrastructure-wg

Stream: fhir/infrastructure-wg

Topic: 2018-05 Köln Thursday Q3

Josh Mandel (May 17 2018 at 11:49):

Chair: @Ewout Kramer
Scribe: @Josh Mandel

Josh Mandel (May 17 2018 at 11:49):

Discussion begins.

Josh Mandel (May 17 2018 at 11:50):

Attendance at https://bit.ly/fhiri.

Josh Mandel (May 17 2018 at 11:50):

• Discuss Bundle.signature.

  • GF#16392 —This element allows for signatures within a bundle, rather than outside. There's a long-term recognize of the use case going back to CDA. We haven't seen this field being used anywhere in current FHIR implementations, so we have no practical experience with signing Bundles. This comment from @John Moehrke proposed dropping Bundle.signature.

  • GF#16519 is a related suggestion to move signatures to .meta.signature.

  • Or we could try to include a signature in Provenance resource as a Bundle.entry.

  • GF#16392 — Not persuasive with mod.

Josh Mandel (May 17 2018 at 12:24):

• Discuss Binary.securityContext.
  • GF#14563 — explanation needs to be more complete. This is a normative candidate. @Grahame Grieve and @John Moehrke will prepare a better description and share back with #fhir/infrastructure-wg .

Josh Mandel (May 17 2018 at 12:36):

• Discuss Contained tags and security labels.
  • GF#16622 — Persuasive.

Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC