FHIR Chat · docs / Issue #343 May 2018 Ballot Comment 137 · cds hooks/github

Stream: cds hooks/github

Topic: docs / Issue #343 May 2018 Ballot Comment 137


view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:03):

cds-hooks-bot opened Issue #343

## May 2018 Ballot Comment 137

Submitted by Nell Lapres on behalf of @isaacvetter from Epic

Chapter:
Section:
Type: A-S :bulb:
In Person Requested? No

Comment:
In the Example prefretch templates section, the prefetch template keys would be more readable if they were named something like "patient", "hemoglobin-a1c" and "user"; rather than "p", "a1c" and "u". While the documentation's goal to illustrate that the prefetch keys can be named whatever is laudable, it's actually not that important. In practice, it would be a benefit to the community if "patient", "user", etc were commonly used by CDS services to describe the current patient and user in prefretch templates.


_This issue was imported by @cds-hooks-bot from the consolidated CDS Hooks May 2018 ballot spreadsheet._

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:03):

cds-hooks-bot milestoned Issue #343

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:03):

cds-hooks-bot labeled Issue #343

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:03):

cds-hooks-bot edited Issue #343

## May 2018 Ballot Comment 137

Submitted by Nell Lapres on behalf of @isaacvetter from Epic

Chapter:
Section:
Type: A-S :bulb:
In Person Requested? No

Comment:
In the Example prefretch templates section, the prefetch template keys would be more readable if they were named something like "patient", "hemoglobin-a1c" and "user"; rather than "p", "a1c" and "u". While the documentation's goal to illustrate that the prefetch keys can be named whatever is laudable, it's actually not that important. In practice, it would be a benefit to the community if "patient", "user", etc were commonly used by CDS services to describe the current patient and user in prefretch templates.


_This issue was imported by @cds-hooks-bot from the consolidated CDS Hooks May 2018 ballot spreadsheet._

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 18 2018 at 09:26):

cds-hooks-bot commented on Issue #343

Proposed Disposition: Persuasive
Proposed Disposition Comment:
Will update as suggested

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 18 2018 at 09:47):

cds-hooks-bot labeled Issue #343

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 30 2018 at 22:24):

cds-hooks-bot commented on Issue #343

## :telephone_receiver: CDS Working Group Block Vote (5-30-2018)

Meeting notes: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=File:2018-05-30_CDS_WG_Call_Minutes.docx

Julia Skapik moved the following disposition, seconded by @brynrhodes.

Disposition: Persuasive
Disposition Comment:
Will update as suggested

:+1: For: 12
:expressionless: Abstain: 0
:-1: Against: 0

:tada: The motion passed! :tada:

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Jun 06 2018 at 15:33):

isaacvetter labeled Issue #343

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Jun 14 2018 at 13:45):

cds-hooks-bot assigned Issue #343

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Dec 05 2018 at 16:34):

kpshek closed Issue #343


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC