FHIR Chat · docs / Issue #338 May 2018 Ballot Comment 132 · cds hooks/github

Stream: cds hooks/github

Topic: docs / Issue #338 May 2018 Ballot Comment 132


view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:03):

cds-hooks-bot milestoned Issue #338

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:03):

cds-hooks-bot labeled Issue #338

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:03):

cds-hooks-bot edited Issue #338

## May 2018 Ballot Comment 132

Submitted by @kensaku-kawamoto on behalf of @gdelfiol from University of Utah

Chapter:
Section: https://cds-hooks.org/hooks/#hook-version
Type: NEG :exclamation:
In Person Requested? No

Existing Wording:

Table

Comment:
Changes in cardinality and optionality are not necessarily breaking changes. For example, a context field that was required but is changed to optional is not breaking and, according to the description above the table, it should not be considered major.

## :de: Köln May 2018 Working Group Vote

@jmandel moved the following disposition, seconded by @brynrhodes.

Disposition: Not Persausive
Disposition Comment:
This is a breaking change. Consider when a required context field is changed to optional. In this case, the CDS Service will no longer received an expected field

:+1: For: 21
:expressionless: Abstain: 2
:-1: Against: 0

:tada: The motion passed! :tada:


_This issue was imported by @cds-hooks-bot from the consolidated CDS Hooks May 2018 ballot spreadsheet._

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:03):

cds-hooks-bot opened Issue #338

## May 2018 Ballot Comment 132

Submitted by @kensaku-kawamoto on behalf of @gdelfiol from University of Utah

Chapter:
Section: https://cds-hooks.org/hooks/#hook-version
Type: NEG :exclamation:
In Person Requested? No

Existing Wording:

Table

Comment:
Changes in cardinality and optionality are not necessarily breaking changes. For example, a context field that was required but is changed to optional is not breaking and, according to the description above the table, it should not be considered major.

## :de: Köln May 2018 Working Group Vote

@jmandel moved the following disposition, seconded by @brynrhodes.

Disposition: Not Persausive
Disposition Comment:
This is a breaking change. Consider when a required context field is changed to optional. In this case, the CDS Service will no longer received an expected field

:+1: For: 21
:expressionless: Abstain: 2
:-1: Against: 0

:tada: The motion passed! :tada:


_This issue was imported by @cds-hooks-bot from the consolidated CDS Hooks May 2018 ballot spreadsheet._

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Jun 14 2018 at 13:44):

cds-hooks-bot assigned Issue #338

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Jul 30 2018 at 17:44):

isaacvetter closed Issue #338

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Jul 30 2018 at 17:44):

isaacvetter commented on Issue #338

Resolving due to negative ballot vote.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC