FHIR Chat · docs / Issue #332 May 2018 Ballot Comment 126 · cds hooks/github

Stream: cds hooks/github

Topic: docs / Issue #332 May 2018 Ballot Comment 126


view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:03):

cds-hooks-bot opened Issue #332

## May 2018 Ballot Comment 126

Submitted by @kensaku-kawamoto from University of Utah

Chapter: Specification Version
Section: https://cds-hooks.org/hooks/
Type: A-S :bulb:
In Person Requested? No

Existing Wording:

Because the specification itself follows semantic versioning, the version specified here is a minimum specification version. In other words, a hook defined to work against 1.0 should continue to work against the 1.1 version of CDS Hooks. However, a hook that specifies 1.1 would not be expected to work in a CDS Hooks 1.0 environment.

Comment:
Recommend making this part a separate section on Backwards Compatibility.


_This issue was imported by @cds-hooks-bot from the consolidated CDS Hooks May 2018 ballot spreadsheet._

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:03):

cds-hooks-bot milestoned Issue #332

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:03):

cds-hooks-bot labeled Issue #332

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:03):

cds-hooks-bot edited Issue #332

## May 2018 Ballot Comment 126

Submitted by @kensaku-kawamoto from University of Utah

Chapter: Specification Version
Section: https://cds-hooks.org/hooks/
Type: A-S :bulb:
In Person Requested? No

Existing Wording:

Because the specification itself follows semantic versioning, the version specified here is a minimum specification version. In other words, a hook defined to work against 1.0 should continue to work against the 1.1 version of CDS Hooks. However, a hook that specifies 1.1 would not be expected to work in a CDS Hooks 1.0 environment.

Comment:
Recommend making this part a separate section on Backwards Compatibility.


_This issue was imported by @cds-hooks-bot from the consolidated CDS Hooks May 2018 ballot spreadsheet._

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 18 2018 at 09:26):

cds-hooks-bot commented on Issue #332

Proposed Disposition: Persuasive with Mod
Proposed Disposition Comment:
We agree with this idea and will look at making this change in a future release.

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 18 2018 at 09:47):

cds-hooks-bot labeled Issue #332

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 30 2018 at 22:24):

cds-hooks-bot commented on Issue #332

## :telephone_receiver: CDS Working Group Block Vote (5-30-2018)

Meeting notes: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=File:2018-05-30_CDS_WG_Call_Minutes.docx

Julia Skapik moved the following disposition, seconded by @brynrhodes.

Disposition: Persuasive with Mod
Disposition Comment:
We agree with this idea and will look at making this change in a future release.

:+1: For: 12
:expressionless: Abstain: 0
:-1: Against: 0

:tada: The motion passed! :tada:

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Jun 14 2018 at 13:44):

cds-hooks-bot assigned Issue #332

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Aug 01 2018 at 20:35):

isaacvetter labeled Issue #332

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Aug 01 2018 at 20:35):

isaacvetter commented on Issue #332

Closing as _deferred_ per the agreed upon disposition. This Backward Compatibility section is needed once we have a v1.1.

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Aug 01 2018 at 20:35):

isaacvetter closed Issue #332


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC