FHIR Chat · docs / Issue #307 May 2018 Ballot Comment 101 · cds hooks/github

Stream: cds hooks/github

Topic: docs / Issue #307 May 2018 Ballot Comment 101


view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:01):

cds-hooks-bot opened Issue #307

## May 2018 Ballot Comment 101

Submitted by @kensaku-kawamoto on behalf of @euvitudo from University of Utah

Chapter: Calling a CDS Service, table
Section: https://cds-hooks.org/specification/1.0/
Type: A-S :bulb:
In Person Requested? No

Existing Wording:

user:
The FHIR resource type + id representing the current user.
The type is one of: Practitioner, Patient, or RelatedPerson.
For example, Practitioner/123

Comment:
Suggest expanding list of allowed user types to include Organization and Device, and potentially others. For example, CDS Hooks could be useful for a device or a health system proactively checking to see if a patient is at risk of sepsis, without a user invoking the check. Related to this, suggest renaming from user to something that does not necessarily have to be a person, such as actor or agent or invokingParty


_This issue was imported by @cds-hooks-bot from the consolidated CDS Hooks May 2018 ballot spreadsheet._

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:01):

cds-hooks-bot milestoned Issue #307

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:01):

cds-hooks-bot labeled Issue #307

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:01):

cds-hooks-bot edited Issue #307

## May 2018 Ballot Comment 101

Submitted by @kensaku-kawamoto on behalf of @euvitudo from University of Utah

Chapter: Calling a CDS Service, table
Section: https://cds-hooks.org/specification/1.0/
Type: A-S :bulb:
In Person Requested? No

Existing Wording:

user:
The FHIR resource type + id representing the current user.
The type is one of: Practitioner, Patient, or RelatedPerson.
For example, Practitioner/123

Comment:
Suggest expanding list of allowed user types to include Organization and Device, and potentially others. For example, CDS Hooks could be useful for a device or a health system proactively checking to see if a patient is at risk of sepsis, without a user invoking the check. Related to this, suggest renaming from user to something that does not necessarily have to be a person, such as actor or agent or invokingParty


_This issue was imported by @cds-hooks-bot from the consolidated CDS Hooks May 2018 ballot spreadsheet._

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 18 2018 at 09:25):

cds-hooks-bot commented on Issue #307

Proposed Disposition: Persuasive with Mod
Proposed Disposition Comment:
We agree and is a reason why we have already decided (per WGM vote) to move the user field outside of the CDS Service Request to the hook context (if a hook chooses to have a user field). This change to move user addresses the comment.

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 18 2018 at 09:46):

cds-hooks-bot labeled Issue #307

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 30 2018 at 22:23):

cds-hooks-bot commented on Issue #307

## :telephone_receiver: CDS Working Group Block Vote (5-30-2018)

Meeting notes: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=File:2018-05-30_CDS_WG_Call_Minutes.docx

Julia Skapik moved the following disposition, seconded by @brynrhodes.

Disposition: Persuasive with Mod
Disposition Comment:
We agree and is a reason why we have already decided (per WGM vote) to move the user field outside of the CDS Service Request to the hook context (if a hook chooses to have a user field). This change to move user addresses the comment.

:+1: For: 12
:expressionless: Abstain: 0
:-1: Against: 0

:tada: The motion passed! :tada:

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Jun 14 2018 at 13:42):

cds-hooks-bot assigned Issue #307

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Aug 02 2018 at 04:21):

isaacvetter commented on Issue #307

I can't find an existing issue or PR that actually moves the user field into context, but I'm pretty certain that it exists ...

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Aug 02 2018 at 08:14):

kpshek commented on Issue #307

I can't find an existing issue or PR that actually moves the user field into context, but I'm pretty certain that it exists ...

That would be #232

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Nov 12 2018 at 22:27):

isaacvetter labeled Issue #307

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Nov 12 2018 at 22:28):

isaacvetter commented on Issue #307

Duplicate of #232, which Bryn's about to resolve.

Going ahead and closing this issue.

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Nov 12 2018 at 22:28):

isaacvetter closed Issue #307


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC