FHIR Chat · docs / Issue #286 May 2018 Ballot Comment 80 · cds hooks/github

Stream: cds hooks/github

Topic: docs / Issue #286 May 2018 Ballot Comment 80


view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:00):

cds-hooks-bot opened Issue #286

## May 2018 Ballot Comment 80

Submitted by @cmoesel from MITRE

Chapter: CDS Service Response
Section: Link
Type: A-S :bulb:
In Person Requested? No

Existing Wording:

label (field in table)

Comment:
Recommend encouraging (if not requiring) a maximum length for the "label" field so UIs can be designed with some expectation of label length.

## :de: Köln May 2018 Working Group Vote

@olbrich moved the following disposition, seconded by @isaacvetter.

Disposition: Not Persuasive
Disposition Comment:
We recognize that there will challenges in ensuring that the link label is clearly understood by users and renders nicely amongst the various EHR vendors. However, we do not see how we can provide an arbitrary length limit at this time without understanding the EHR implementations, usability research, and CDS Service link examples.

:+1: For: 9
:expressionless: Abstain: 0
:-1: Against: 0

:tada: The motion passed! :tada:


_This issue was imported by @cds-hooks-bot from the consolidated CDS Hooks May 2018 ballot spreadsheet._

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:00):

cds-hooks-bot milestoned Issue #286

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:00):

cds-hooks-bot labeled Issue #286

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:00):

cds-hooks-bot edited Issue #286

## May 2018 Ballot Comment 80

Submitted by @cmoesel from MITRE

Chapter: CDS Service Response
Section: Link
Type: A-S :bulb:
In Person Requested? No

Existing Wording:

label (field in table)

Comment:
Recommend encouraging (if not requiring) a maximum length for the "label" field so UIs can be designed with some expectation of label length.

## :de: Köln May 2018 Working Group Vote

@olbrich moved the following disposition, seconded by @isaacvetter.

Disposition: Not Persuasive
Disposition Comment:
We recognize that there will challenges in ensuring that the link label is clearly understood by users and renders nicely amongst the various EHR vendors. However, we do not see how we can provide an arbitrary length limit at this time without understanding the EHR implementations, usability research, and CDS Service link examples.

:+1: For: 9
:expressionless: Abstain: 0
:-1: Against: 0

:tada: The motion passed! :tada:


_This issue was imported by @cds-hooks-bot from the consolidated CDS Hooks May 2018 ballot spreadsheet._

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:09):

kpshek commented on Issue #286

Closing per the _ Not Persuasive_ vote at the :de: Köln May 2018 working group meeting.

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (May 16 2018 at 23:09):

kpshek closed Issue #286

view this post on Zulip Github Notifications (Jun 14 2018 at 13:40):

cds-hooks-bot assigned Issue #286


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC