Stream: FHIRcast
Topic: Review of FHIRcast STU2 candidate
Bas van den Heuvel (Dec 14 2020 at 10:36):
As requested in the last call, I've reviewed the FHIRcast STU2 candidate. The comments are in the attached word document. I streamlined some sentences, removed some duplications and added some comments.
PreSTU2-review-FHIRcast-BvdH.docx
Bas van den Heuvel (Dec 14 2020 at 10:36):
Should I file this a ticket on github?
Isaac Vetter (Dec 30 2020 at 19:05):
Bas - in addition to this github issue, I've also got this pull request addressing almost all of your suggested wording changes. In a few cases, I'm uncertain that your proposed wording is an improvement, in which case, I've commented on this version of your word doc.
Bas van den Heuvel (Dec 30 2020 at 20:11):
I'll take a look at it. Can it wait until next week?
Isaac Vetter (Dec 30 2020 at 20:12):
I think so. Although TSC is meeting on the 4th, FHIRcast isn't on their agenda.
Bas van den Heuvel (Jan 04 2021 at 10:00):
@Isaac Vetter, I went over the changes you made. The majority look great and really improve the spec - good work. There are still a couple issues. One that I really do not agree with. I filed them as a comment on the pull request.
Isaac Vetter (Jan 04 2021 at 20:24):
thank you, Bas! made some updates and am arguing with you in the PR. What do you think?
Bas van den Heuvel (Jan 04 2021 at 20:48):
I like what I see - I'll take a closer look in the morning.
Bas van den Heuvel (Jan 05 2021 at 10:08):
I've reviewed the changes and I think we are good to go forward an publish this thing.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
