Stream: fhircast-github
Topic: fhircast-docs / Issue #118 May 2019 Ballot Comment: Secur...
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Apr 30 2019 at 19:51):
hl7-fhircast-bot opened Issue #118
## May 2019 Ballot Comment: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Submitted by Ricardo Quintano Neira on behalf of @bvdh
Chapter/section: Overview
Url: https://fhircast.hl7.org/specification/May2019Ballot/index.html
Type: A-QSummary: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Comment: "In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.".
So, security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Existing wording: In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Apr 30 2019 at 19:51):
hl7-fhircast-bot labeled Issue #118
## May 2019 Ballot Comment: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Submitted by Ricardo Quintano Neira on behalf of @bvdh
Chapter/section: Overview
Url: https://fhircast.hl7.org/specification/May2019Ballot/index.html
Type: A-QSummary: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Comment: "In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.".
So, security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Existing wording: In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Apr 30 2019 at 19:51):
hl7-fhircast-bot edited Issue #118
## May 2019 Ballot Comment: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Submitted by Ricardo Quintano Neira on behalf of @bvdh
Chapter/section: Overview
Url: https://fhircast.hl7.org/specification/May2019Ballot/index.html
Type: A-QSummary: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Comment: "In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.".
So, security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Existing wording: In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (May 30 2019 at 03:04):
isaacvetter commented on Issue #118:
Proposed resolution: Persuasive
Proposed resolution comment: @Bvdh, as also stated in other comment resolutions, we're going to change the spec to make SMART/OAuth a SHOULD and not a SHALL. We'll update this wording to comply
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (May 30 2019 at 03:04):
isaacvetter labeled Issue #118:
## May 2019 Ballot Comment: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Submitted by Ricardo Quintano Neira on behalf of @bvdh
Chapter/section: Overview
Url: https://fhircast.hl7.org/specification/May2019Ballot/index.html
Type: A-QSummary: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Comment: "In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.".
So, security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Existing wording: In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Jun 18 2019 at 15:48):
wmaethner labeled Issue #118:
## May 2019 Ballot Comment: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Submitted by Ricardo Quintano Neira on behalf of @bvdh
Chapter/section: Overview
Url: https://fhircast.hl7.org/specification/May2019Ballot/index.html
Type: A-QSummary: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Comment: "In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.".
So, security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Existing wording: In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Jun 18 2019 at 15:48):
wmaethner commented on Issue #118:
## :landline: II Working Group Vote (6-18-2019)
Block vote@isaacvetter moved the following disposition, seconded by Ricardo Quintano Neira
Disposition: Persuasive
Disposition Comment: Will fix as described in the issue comments or by the commenter:+1: For: 10
:expressionless: Abstain: 2
:-1: Against: 0:tada: The motion passed! :tada:
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Sep 04 2019 at 20:44):
isaacvetter commented on Issue #118:
Fixes in this commit: https://github.com/HL7/fhircast-docs/commit/396b691d236b0978919d11fbf00139a1dd721be5
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Sep 04 2019 at 20:44):
isaacvetter closed Issue #118:
May 2019 Ballot Comment: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Submitted by Ricardo Quintano Neira on behalf of @bvdh
Chapter/section: Overview
Url: https://fhircast.hl7.org/specification/May2019Ballot/index.html
Type: A-QSummary: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Comment: "In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.".
So, security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Existing wording: In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Sep 04 2019 at 20:44):
isaacvetter labeled Issue #118:
May 2019 Ballot Comment: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Submitted by Ricardo Quintano Neira on behalf of @bvdh
Chapter/section: Overview
Url: https://fhircast.hl7.org/specification/May2019Ballot/index.html
Type: A-QSummary: Security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Comment: "In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.".
So, security is not optional. Is that really required from a spec point of view?
Existing wording: In all cases the app authenticates to the Hub with an OAuth 2.0 bearer token.
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Sep 04 2019 at 20:45):
isaacvetter edited a comment on Issue #118:
Fixed in this commit: https://github.com/HL7/fhircast-docs/commit/396b691d236b0978919d11fbf00139a1dd721be5
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
