Stream: fhircast-github
Topic: fhircast-docs / Issue #102 May 2019 Ballot Comment: Is sw...
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Apr 30 2019 at 19:51):
hl7-fhircast-bot opened Issue #102
## May 2019 Ballot Comment: Is switch needed?
Submitted by @MichaelTClifton on behalf of @wmaethner (wmaethne@epic.com )
Chapter/section: Event Catalog
Url:
Type: A-Q EnhancementSummary: Is switch needed?
Comment: Do we need the patient and imaging switch events? Starting with the simple model of open/close events is really appealing, but also limits the complexity of a context synchronization integration. How many systems today support a switch concept? How many systems today, support having multiple patients or studies open at a time?
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Apr 30 2019 at 19:51):
hl7-fhircast-bot labeled Issue #102
## May 2019 Ballot Comment: Is switch needed?
Submitted by @MichaelTClifton on behalf of @wmaethner (wmaethne@epic.com )
Chapter/section: Event Catalog
Url:
Type: A-Q EnhancementSummary: Is switch needed?
Comment: Do we need the patient and imaging switch events? Starting with the simple model of open/close events is really appealing, but also limits the complexity of a context synchronization integration. How many systems today support a switch concept? How many systems today, support having multiple patients or studies open at a time?
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Apr 30 2019 at 19:51):
hl7-fhircast-bot edited Issue #102
## May 2019 Ballot Comment: Is switch needed?
Submitted by @MichaelTClifton on behalf of @wmaethner (wmaethne@epic.com )
Chapter/section: Event Catalog
Url:
Type: A-Q EnhancementSummary: Is switch needed?
Comment: Do we need the patient and imaging switch events? Starting with the simple model of open/close events is really appealing, but also limits the complexity of a context synchronization integration. How many systems today support a switch concept? How many systems today, support having multiple patients or studies open at a time?
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Apr 30 2019 at 21:11):
isaacvetter commented on Issue #102
Duplicate of negative #156
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (May 06 2019 at 14:02):
wmaethner labeled Issue #102
## May 2019 Ballot Comment: Is switch needed?
Submitted by @MichaelTClifton on behalf of @wmaethner (wmaethne@epic.com )
Chapter/section: Event Catalog
Url:
Type: A-Q EnhancementSummary: Is switch needed?
Comment: Do we need the patient and imaging switch events? Starting with the simple model of open/close events is really appealing, but also limits the complexity of a context synchronization integration. How many systems today support a switch concept? How many systems today, support having multiple patients or studies open at a time?
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Jun 04 2019 at 13:22):
wmaethner labeled Issue #102:
## May 2019 Ballot Comment: Is switch needed?
Submitted by @MichaelTClifton on behalf of @wmaethner (wmaethne@epic.com )
Chapter/section: Event Catalog
Url:
Type: A-Q EnhancementSummary: Is switch needed?
Comment: Do we need the patient and imaging switch events? Starting with the simple model of open/close events is really appealing, but also limits the complexity of a context synchronization integration. How many systems today support a switch concept? How many systems today, support having multiple patients or studies open at a time?
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Jun 04 2019 at 13:23):
wmaethner commented on Issue #102:
Resolved in #156
Github Notifications (FHIRcast) (Sep 11 2019 at 20:51):
wmaethner closed Issue #102:
May 2019 Ballot Comment: Is switch needed?
Submitted by @MichaelTClifton on behalf of @wmaethner (wmaethne@epic.com )
Chapter/section: Event Catalog
Url:
Type: A-Q EnhancementSummary: Is switch needed?
Comment: Do we need the patient and imaging switch events? Starting with the simple model of open/close events is really appealing, but also limits the complexity of a context synchronization integration. How many systems today support a switch concept? How many systems today, support having multiple patients or studies open at a time?
_This issue was imported by @hl7-fhircast-bot from the consolidated FHIRcast May 2019 ballot spreadsheet._
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
