FHIR Chat · Normative publication draft · fhirpath

Stream: fhirpath

Topic: Normative publication draft


view this post on Zulip Bryn Rhodes (Oct 07 2019 at 18:22):

I've finished applying all the reconciliation changes to the FHIRPath spec and have a publication draft here. Take a look if you get a chance, we'll now start pursuing publication.

view this post on Zulip Paul Lynch (Oct 07 2019 at 20:34):

The pending normative status makes me nervous, due to the way that "normative" pours concrete on everything, and the new draft is 75% larger than the previous STU1 document. Might it have been better to target this as an STU2, to give people more time to find problems with it? (I realize I should have made this comment during the ballot, and it is probably too late now.) Has anyone fully implemented the new version?

view this post on Zulip Bryn Rhodes (Oct 07 2019 at 20:58):

There have been 3 ballots since STU1, and the engines (at least the ones surrounding the FHIR implementation) have kept pace with those ballots. There are also sections of the specification that are still marked Trial Use, for areas that have less implementation experience.

view this post on Zulip Paul Lynch (Oct 07 2019 at 20:59):

Okay-- that's reassuring. Thanks.

view this post on Zulip Bryn Rhodes (Oct 08 2019 at 16:18):

ITS has scheduled a call October 22nd to consider the publication request.

view this post on Zulip Paul Lynch (Oct 16 2019 at 14:00):

The links on Date/Time Arithmetic are broken (except in the table of contents).

view this post on Zulip Bryn Rhodes (Oct 22 2019 at 18:08):

@Paul Lynch , yes, it looks like there's a difference in the way the Jekyll processing works on Windows and Linux, so that when I fix it on my machine, it breaks on the build, and vice versa :)

view this post on Zulip Bryn Rhodes (Oct 22 2019 at 18:08):

FYI, the ITS call originally scheduled for today has been cancelled due to co-chair availability and has been rescheduled for the 29th.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC