FHIR Chat · AMT to ARTG Id ConceptMap · ncts-connectathon

Stream: ncts-connectathon

Topic: AMT to ARTG Id ConceptMap


view this post on Zulip Jim Steel (Apr 17 2018 at 02:26):

Someone was interested in mapping AMT codes to ARTG Ids. There is an implicit ConceptMap for this as part of SNOMED CT-AU, which can be called by something like {{url}}/ConceptMap/$translate?source=http://snomed.info/sct?fhir_vs&system=http://snomed.info/sct&code=44487011000036100&target=https://www.tga.gov.au/australian-register-therapeutic-goods&url=http://snomed.info/sct?fhir_cm=11000168105

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Apr 17 2018 at 02:29):

didn't we have a fhir concept map running around for that?

view this post on Zulip Jim Steel (Apr 17 2018 at 05:13):

Yep, that's the one I'm referencing with the url parameter. Unless you mean an explicit one? We expose it as an implicit, like the historical association maps (we also do AMT substance to international substance, and one or two others)

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Apr 17 2018 at 09:24):

I thought I created an explicit one somehwere

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Apr 17 2018 at 22:34):

https://ontoserver.csiro.au/stu3-latest/ConceptMap/sct2artgid/$translate?code=60877011000036109&system=http://snomed.info/sct&target=https://www.tga.gov.au/australian-register-therapeutic-goods?fhir_vs
Yes, here is an example of using it.
My question is just to verify that this content is managed, and not just a once of experiment.

view this post on Zulip Jim Steel (Apr 17 2018 at 23:34):

@Brian Postlethwaite note that the path I used is slightly different to yours (its a type-level $translate, which isn't in the FHIR spec, but is being added). Its maintained in the sense that it reflects the map that's released with the SNOMED CT-AU release, but its an implicit concept map that isn't one of the ones listed in the FHIR SNOMED page, so from that point of view, it could be argued that its not a standard one

view this post on Zulip John Grimes (Apr 17 2018 at 23:37):

@Jim Steel What version of Ontoserver is the implicit ARTG map available within?

view this post on Zulip Jim Steel (Apr 17 2018 at 23:39):

It goes back ages. Hang on and I'll work out the first version...

view this post on Zulip Jim Steel (Apr 17 2018 at 23:41):

Since Ontoserver 5.0.0

view this post on Zulip John Grimes (Apr 17 2018 at 23:43):

Thanks

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Apr 18 2018 at 01:06):

http://hl7.org/fhir/conceptmap-operations.html#translate
Both the type and instance level operations are defined in the spec...
(or i've missunderstood you)

view this post on Zulip Jim Steel (Apr 18 2018 at 01:07):

The unsupportedness was actually the url parameter

view this post on Zulip Jim Steel (Apr 18 2018 at 01:08):

Its supported in http://build.fhir.org/conceptmap-operation-translate.html though


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC