Stream: Orders and Observation WG
Topic: OO FHIR Block Vote for Thursday June 28th OO Conference Call
Eric Haas (Jun 22 2018 at 05:35):
OO FHIR Block Vote for Thursday June 28th OO Conference Call. Let me know if you would like to remove any item from the block for discussion.
Comment Submitters
- Eric Haas
- Julie Evans
- Lloyd McKenzie
- None
- Richard Townley-O'Neill
Line Items
1. GF#17382 Extend+Observation+by+adding+blinding+flag (Julie Evans) Not Persuasive
2. GF#17386 Extend+Observation.specimen+by+adding+investigator+specimen+comments (None) Not Persuasive
3. GF#17387 Extend+Specimen.collection+by+adding+planned+collection+time+elapsed (Julie Evans) Not Persuasive
4. GF#17390 Extend+Specimen.subject+to+include+a+reference+to+ResearchSubject (None) Not Persuasive
5. GF#17391 Extend+Observation+by+adding+test+level+comments (Julie Evans) Not Persuasive
6. GF#17392 Extend+Observation+by+adding+test+status (Julie Evans) Not Persuasive
7. GF#17393 Extend+Observation+by+adding+test+type (None) Not Persuasive
8. GF#17396 Extend+Observation+by+adding+a+reference+to+ResearchStudy (Julie Evans) Not Persuasive
9. GF#17342 review+and+clarify+Task%2FProcedure%2FServiceRequest%2FEncounter+Boundaries (Eric Haas) Persuasive
10. GF#17360 Add+Task.insurance (Lloyd McKenzie) Persuasive
11. GF#17361 Add+%22unknown%22+as+an+intent (Lloyd McKenzie) Persuasive
12. GF#17376 Definition+of+Device.location+is+wrong (Richard Townley-O'Neill) Persuasive
13. GF#17389 Extend+Specimen+by+adding+specimen+condition (Julie Evans) Persuasive
14. GF#17380 Extend+Specimen.collection+by+adding+fasting+status (Julie Evans) Persuasive with Mod
Riki Merrick (Jun 26 2018 at 20:04):
We need to start work on the specimen resource and base it on the specimen DAM - My bad for not having had the time to set up a doodle poll to pull together a project call, but I prefer to do that systematically rather than in individual tracker items (once we have the approach, then we can make tracker items for each to make it easier for the editor) - since these are not ballot related I would like to hold off on these:
Riki Merrick (Jun 26 2018 at 20:04):
3. GF#17387 Extend+Specimen.collection+by+adding+planned+collection+time+elapsed (Julie Evans) Not Persuasive
4. GF#17390 Extend+Specimen.subject+to+include+a+reference+to+ResearchSubject (None) Not Persuasive13. GF#17389 Extend+Specimen+by+adding+specimen+condition (Julie Evans) Persuasive
14. GF#17380 Extend+Specimen.collection+by+adding+fasting+status (Julie Evans) Persuasive with Mod
Eric Haas (Jun 26 2018 at 20:13):
GF#17387 is covered by another mechanism and does not need to be addressed separateley so I would like to keep in the vote with the proposed resolution.
I would like get the other two trackers resolved in time for R5, they bring up legitimate issues for implementers who are currently using the resource. Do you think you will have all the updates to specimen done by them?
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
