Stream: questionnaire
Topic: SDC constraints
Elliot Silver (Dec 13 2020 at 01:23):
I have a questionnaire claiming compliance with http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire, and am getting the following error in my IG QA:
sdc-1: An item cannot have an answerExpression if answerOption or answerValueSet is already present. [extension('http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-answerExpression').empty().not implies (answerOption.empty() and answerValueSet.empty())]
This occurs for two items 2 and 3, but I have several other #choice items that use answerValueSet, so I don't know what the issue is.
Items 2 and 3 are:
* item[2].linkId = "report_country"
* item[2].text = "Reporting country:"
* item[2].code = $LNC#77983-5
* item[2].type = #choice
* item[2].answerValueSet = "#WhoCrValueSetQuestionnaireCountry"
// skip item[2].item[0]...
* item[3].linkId = "report_test_reason"
* item[3].text = "Why tested for COVID-19:"
* item[3].code = $LNC#67098-4 "Reason for test or procedure"
* item[3].repeats = true
* item[3].type = #choice
* item[3].answerValueSet = "#WhoCrValueSetQuestionnaireReasonForTesting"
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 13 2020 at 03:50):
@Bryn Rhodes Do we need .not() instead of .not?
Bryn Rhodes (Dec 13 2020 at 04:16):
Yes, not is a function so needs the parens
Elliot Silver (Dec 13 2020 at 04:18):
While you’re at it, the “already” is odd phrasing. Does that imply that switching the order would change things? I suggest dropping the word.
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 13 2020 at 05:07):
Can you submit a technical correction to deal with both @Elliot Silver ?
Elliot Silver (Dec 13 2020 at 05:08):
Will do.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
