FHIR Chat · Vietnam question · patient administration WG

Stream: patient administration WG

Topic: Vietnam question

Grahame Grieve (Mar 01 2018 at 02:01):

I'm wrestling with implementing the Vietnamese national Patient summary using Patient. Most things are straight forward. but not everything. Consider this fragment from the paper form they are moving to electronic:

Grahame Grieve (Mar 01 2018 at 02:01):

Mother (Full name):……………………………Father (Full name):………………………………..
Primary caregiver (Full name):………………..………….Relationship:……………………...…….
Phone No. (mother/father/primary caregiver):……………………………………………………….
Telephone:………………………………………Mobile phone:…………………………………….

Grahame Grieve (Mar 01 2018 at 02:02):

so Primary Caregiver... I can't find a good for that... surely we have one somewhere. But I'm less than thrilled by the extensible binding to the v2 table for Patient.contact.relationshipType. Surely we can add the v3 family member value set to that too?

Grahame Grieve (Mar 01 2018 at 02:03):

also, the primary caregiver has a double code - that they are primary, and what their relationship is... is that 2 relationship types? (but it would very often be the mother. no?)

Grahame Grieve (Mar 01 2018 at 02:03):

that bit is obscure to me

Grahame Grieve (Mar 01 2018 at 02:05):

surely primary caregiver should be in http://build.fhir.org/v3/PersonalRelationshipRoleType/vs.html

Simone Heckmann (Mar 01 2018 at 08:18):

Slightly off-topic, but why do the V2 codes in http://build.fhir.org/v2/0131/index.html have deprecated flags whereas the same codes in http://build.fhir.org/valueset-relatedperson-relationshiptype.html don't?

Grahame Grieve (Mar 01 2018 at 08:26):

cause I don't bring them forwards through the expansion process

Brian Postlethwaite (Mar 04 2018 at 06:51):

You woudn't have them as a RelatedPerson? That has the v3 binding, and supports the multiple relationships that you're looking for.

Grahame Grieve (Mar 04 2018 at 09:31):

umm, I'm just doing contacts in Patient.contact. Perhaps I misunderstand, but I thought RelatedPerson was for when they actually did something, not just got provided as contact details?

Grahame Grieve (Mar 04 2018 at 09:31):

why would the relationship value set be different between the two of them?

Brian Postlethwaite (Mar 04 2018 at 09:33):

The Patient.Contact set is more restrictive than the RelatedPerson, as expect only a limited set in the Patient.Contact.

Grahame Grieve (Mar 04 2018 at 09:39):

what do we expect in patient.contact? we don't expect to see 'primary carer' in there? really?

Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC