Stream: IG creation
Topic: fhirpath locations in the errors
Brian Postlethwaite (Jul 05 2019 at 02:03):
Is it just me or are all the fhirpath locations in the IG publisher qa output using 1 based indexing, not 0 based indexing that I was expecting?
(had me baffled for sometime trying to locate which property was causing the issue)
https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/VhDir/qa.html#_scratch_ig-build-temp-2ACLVV_repo_source_examples_practitioner-example-washington
In this example the error is in the 2nd extension in the first qualification, which should be
Practitioner.qualification[0].extension.extension[1].valueCodeableConcept
not
Practitioner.qualification[1].extension.extension[2].valueCodeableConcept
@Grahame Grieve is this something that is known already?
Grahame Grieve (Jul 05 2019 at 02:34):
I just asked about this on the implementers channel
Vadim Peretokin (Jul 05 2019 at 07:25):
yes, known: https://github.com/hapifhir/org.hl7.fhir.core/issues/50
Grahame Grieve (Jul 05 2019 at 10:27):
fixed next release
Grahame Grieve (Jul 05 2019 at 10:28):
in fact it should be
Grahame Grieve (Jul 05 2019 at 10:28):
Practitioner.qualification[0].extension[0].extension[1].value.ofType(CodeableConcept)
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
