Stream: IG creation
Topic: ValueSet http://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp13.txt not found
Bryn Rhodes (Apr 01 2022 at 17:46):
I'm trying to address this warning in the QM IG:
ValueSet http://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp13.txt not found by validator
I see the logic in the validator that is adding this warning, checkMaxValueSet, but I'm not sure how to add this value set?
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 01 2022 at 18:26):
Where is that valueset reference coming from?
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 01 2022 at 18:27):
Seems like something from an old FHIR version
John Moehrke (Apr 01 2022 at 18:36):
so cqf-measures IG that he is working on is STU3.
Bryn Rhodes (Apr 01 2022 at 19:03):
No, it's R4, but it's coming from the maxBinding of the Expression.expression element that we're using for criteria.
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 01 2022 at 19:58):
There should be no maxBinding that's pointing to a URL like that in R4...
John Moehrke (Apr 01 2022 at 20:00):
Bryn Rhodes said:
No, it's R4, but it's coming from the maxBinding of the Expression.expression element that we're using for criteria.
John Moehrke (Apr 01 2022 at 20:00):
so you converted it to R4? The one on github is STU3
Grahame Grieve (Apr 01 2022 at 20:12):
version doesn't matter. Where do we imply that that is a valid value set?
John Moehrke (Apr 01 2022 at 20:14):
in STU3, mime-type elements were bound directly to that.
John Moehrke (Apr 01 2022 at 20:16):
for example the Attachment datatype .contentType element
Grahame Grieve (Apr 01 2022 at 20:16):
where?
John Moehrke (Apr 01 2022 at 20:17):
http://hl7.org/fhir/STU3/datatypes.html#Attachment
John Moehrke (Apr 01 2022 at 20:18):
I don't know where else
Grahame Grieve (Apr 01 2022 at 20:20):
hmm somehow I switched versions when I looked it up.
Grahame Grieve (Apr 01 2022 at 20:21):
we fixed that, so I don't see why we should continue to use it. @Bryn Rhodes which version is the IG based on? this thread isn't clear
Bryn Rhodes (Apr 01 2022 at 21:25):
The iG is R4, @John Moehrke where are you seeing STU3. It started there but we upgraded it several cycles ago.
Grahame Grieve (Apr 01 2022 at 21:25):
so then you should use the R4 value set
Bryn Rhodes (Apr 01 2022 at 21:27):
I’m not overriding anything, it’s coming forom the base spec’s maxBinding http://hl7.org/fhir/metadatatypes-definitions.html#Expression.language
Bryn Rhodes (Apr 01 2022 at 21:28):
At least that’s what i think is happening.
John Moehrke (Apr 01 2022 at 21:28):
can you tell us which github repo you are using?
Bryn Rhodes (Apr 01 2022 at 21:29):
https://github.com/HL7/cqf-measures
John Moehrke (Apr 01 2022 at 21:30):
I am sure that is the one I pulled.. will try again.
John Moehrke (Apr 01 2022 at 21:33):
latest repo is clearly FHIR R4. hmm, not sure what I was looking at,.
John Moehrke (Apr 01 2022 at 21:46):
found one of them... cqf-expression, forces this valueset
http://hl7.org/fhir/R4/metadatatypes.html#Expression
John Moehrke (Apr 01 2022 at 21:48):
current fhir core seems to have fixed that http://build.fhir.org/metadatatypes.html#expression
Bryn Rhodes (Apr 05 2022 at 14:55):
But in an R4 IG, how do I address it?
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 05 2022 at 15:26):
At minimum, we should fix it in R4B
Bryn Rhodes (Apr 05 2022 at 16:35):
https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-36705
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
