FHIR Chat · VSAC Integration · IG creation

Stream: IG creation

Topic: VSAC Integration


view this post on Zulip Brett Marquard (Nov 18 2021 at 01:42):

Good day -- two questions

  1. Am I doing the <include>correctly to reference value sets in VSAC? see US Core Birth Sex
  2. Will the publisher support pulling in concepts from VSAC these value sets?

view this post on Zulip Brett Marquard (Nov 18 2021 at 01:42):

@Grahame Grieve - totally fine if this is low on priority list, just curious if it will happen before April 2022. If not, we may just replicate in FHIR built.

view this post on Zulip Brett Marquard (Nov 18 2021 at 01:42):

@Robert McClure @Eric Haas as FYI

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Nov 18 2021 at 02:09):

http://cts.nlm.nih.gov not https://cts.nlm.nih.gov

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Nov 18 2021 at 02:10):

it's not low on the priority list and I can't imagine not dealing with it by the January meeting

view this post on Zulip Brett Marquard (Nov 19 2021 at 16:01):

@Rob Hausam and @Grahame Grieve - Do you want us to add a note on each page where this occurring?

view this post on Zulip Brett Marquard (Nov 19 2021 at 16:01):

image.png

view this post on Zulip Brett Marquard (Nov 19 2021 at 16:01):

Just getting build errors, and want to make sure justification is clear.

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Nov 19 2021 at 16:07):

@Brett Marquard What's the "here it is for your review" part? It seems a little odd to say "coming soon!!" and also "here it is". So probably I would at least finesse the wording a bit. I can see why you may want to do this. I don't know if I would (or wouldn't), but at least it could clearly explain the issue.

view this post on Zulip Brett Marquard (Nov 19 2021 at 16:48):

@Rob Hausam it would be above here: https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/US-Core/ValueSet-birthsex.html

view this post on Zulip Brett Marquard (Nov 19 2021 at 16:49):

our struggle is when we don't include these types of notes, we get bonus ballot comments to manage

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Nov 20 2021 at 03:38):

@Rob Hausam That is image is a proof of concept of options for how we could manually render the expansion in case the build is not ready to provide it. Obviously the wording would be more formal. Like Brett said we don't want a bunch of confused balloters making comments because of an ig publishing issue :-)


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC