Stream: IG creation
Topic: URL for R5 pre-adoption extension
Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 08 2020 at 20:43):
I'm trying to use an extension in an R4 CommunicationRequest profile to pre-adopt the target type of CodeableConcept in CommunicationRequest.payload.content. I've tried using both http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/extension-CommunicationRequest.payload.content and http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/extension-CommunicationRequest.payload.contentCodeableConcept, but the validator complains about both. What's the correct approach? (@Grahame Grieve)
Grahame Grieve (Nov 10 2020 at 20:25):
don't know. what's the error?
Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 10 2020 at 20:41):
There's a whole bunch. Search for payload.content in the QA here: https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-crd/qa.html
Grahame Grieve (Nov 13 2020 at 02:49):
according to the spec, you should have http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-CommunicationRequest.payload.content
Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 13 2020 at 04:20):
Tx
Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 13 2020 at 04:40):
@Grahame Grieve Corrected the URL, still getting a bunch of errors: http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-crd/branches/master/qa.html
Grahame Grieve (Nov 16 2020 at 01:29):
the spec doesn't says to use ElementDefinition.id, so that's CommunicationRequest.payload.content[x]
Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 16 2020 at 02:13):
Just changed it to that and pushed. Doesn't seem to make much difference
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 01 2020 at 15:39):
@Grahame Grieve This issue is still outstanding
Grahame Grieve (Dec 03 2020 at 01:09):
fixed up next release.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
