FHIR Chat · SCT value set warnings · IG creation

Stream: IG creation

Topic: SCT value set warnings


view this post on Zulip Nathan Davis (Aug 06 2020 at 21:23):

I'm getting many warnings stating that the SNOMED codes I'm using are not valid in http://snomed.info/sct. I know that the codes are valid. How do I fix the warning? The IG is the Vital Signs IG http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/cimi-vital-signs/branches/master/index.html The qa output can be found at http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/cimi-vital-signs/branches/master/qa.html

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Aug 06 2020 at 21:49):

@Grahame Grieve

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 06 2020 at 23:25):

@Nathan Davis the only warning I get is this one:

The code 24311000205101 is not valid in the system http://snomed.info/sct

This looks correct to me: I don't find 24311000205101 in the snomed browser

view this post on Zulip Nathan Davis (Aug 07 2020 at 13:53):

@Grahame Grieve Thank you!

view this post on Zulip Ted Klein (Aug 07 2020 at 14:09):

I an dead in the water here with publisher 1.1.9 now - was working same content with 1.1.5 - when it checks for supported code systems set it crashes: Terminology server: Check for supported code systems for http://snomed.info/sct (02:30.0230)
Publishing Content Failed: null (02:41.0454)
Was there a change and I have to put the cache file somewhere else, or declare something? @Grahame Grieve what changed and how can I get the UTG build working again now?

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Aug 07 2020 at 14:47):

I'm getting the same error with 1.1.9:

Terminology server: Check for supported code systems for http://snomed.info/sct  (02:42.0231)
Publishing Content Failed: null                                                  (02:55.0128)
                                                                                 (02:55.0129)
Use -? to get command line help                                                  (02:55.0129)
                                                                                 (02:55.0130)
Stack Dump (for debugging):                                                      (02:55.0130)
java.lang.NullPointerException
    at org.hl7.fhir.validation.instance.type.ValueSetValidator.validateValueSetIncludeConcept(ValueSetValidator.java:149)
    at org.hl7.fhir.validation.instance.type.ValueSetValidator.validateValueSetInclude(ValueSetValidator.java:106)
    at org.hl7.fhir.validation.instance.type.ValueSetValidator.validateValueSetCompose(ValueSetValidator.java:65)
    at org.hl7.fhir.validation.instance.type.ValueSetValidator.validateValueSet(ValueSetValidator.java:55)
    at org.hl7.fhir.validation.instance.InstanceValidator.checkSpecials(InstanceValidator.java:3647)
    at org.hl7.fhir.validation.instance.InstanceValidator.startInner(InstanceValidator.java:3619)
    at org.hl7.fhir.validation.instance.InstanceValidator.start(InstanceValidator.java:3497)
    at org.hl7.fhir.validation.instance.InstanceValidator.validateResource(InstanceValidator.java:4595)
    at org.hl7.fhir.validation.instance.InstanceValidator.validate(InstanceValidator.java:685)
    at org.hl7.fhir.validation.instance.InstanceValidator.validate(InstanceValidator.java:661)
    at org.hl7.fhir.igtools.publisher.Publisher.validate(Publisher.java:4722)
    at org.hl7.fhir.igtools.publisher.Publisher.validate(Publisher.java:3720)
    at org.hl7.fhir.igtools.publisher.Publisher.loadConformance(Publisher.java:3701)
    at org.hl7.fhir.igtools.publisher.Publisher.createIg(Publisher.java:854)
    at org.hl7.fhir.igtools.publisher.Publisher.execute(Publisher.java:715)
    at org.hl7.fhir.igtools.publisher.Publisher.main(Publisher.java:7912)

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Aug 07 2020 at 14:59):

Apparently it's a bug in the ValueSetValidator code. I think I see where the NPE is happening.

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Aug 07 2020 at 15:12):

@Ted Klein It looks like that problem has been fixed in 1.1.10.

view this post on Zulip Ted Klein (Aug 07 2020 at 18:16):

OK let me install that one. Grahame told me early this morning I should be using 1.1.9


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC