FHIR Chat · Relative link expanded to the base specification · IG creation

Stream: IG creation

Topic: Relative link expanded to the base specification


view this post on Zulip Bryn Rhodes (Mar 28 2022 at 20:16):

I have a relative link in the comment of a StructureDefinition ([Expansion Rules](measure-terminology-service.html#expansion-rules)) but when it renders in the publisher, it becomes a link to the base specification. I've tried using the site.data.canonical data element, but it is not resolved: ([Expansion Rules]({{site.data.canonical}}measure-terminology-service.html#expansion-rules)). Is there a way to get the IG path resolved in this way, or to instruct the publisher to leave it as a relative link? Or should I remove the link?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Mar 28 2022 at 21:29):

this is a todo for me - it should be left as a relative link

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Mar 29 2022 at 05:14):

fixd next release

view this post on Zulip Bryn Rhodes (Mar 29 2022 at 14:45):

Thank you!


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC