Stream: IG creation
Topic: Is there a meta tag for grouping
Michael van der Zel (Jan 08 2021 at 13:31):
Is there a way to put the grouping in a StructureDefinition as opposed to adding this in the ImplementationGuide file?
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 08 2021 at 13:32):
discussion is ongoing
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 08 2021 at 13:33):
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 08 2021 at 13:34):
i think this is related
https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179252-IG-creation/topic/Adding.20Description.20for.20Examples.20to.20ImplementationGuide.20-.20how
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 08 2021 at 13:35):
I started to work on a Composition so that the IG publisher gets the resources/examples in groups according to the Composition
Michael van der Zel (Jan 08 2021 at 13:40):
Yes. This is related. Thanks.
I have a use-case were I generate the StructureDefinitions and now I also have to generate the ImplementationGuide, just for the grouping and descriptions. Would be great if that info could be put in the StructureDef.
John Moehrke (Jan 08 2021 at 13:49):
the problem I see with that is that the structureDefinition then becomes only useable in that implementation guide. The hope is that structureDefinitions can be re-used
Jose Costa Teixeira (Jan 08 2021 at 13:53):
@Michael van der Zel are you using sushi?
Michael van der Zel (Jan 08 2021 at 16:52):
John Moehrke said:
the problem I see with that is that the structureDefinition then becomes only useable in that implementation guide. The hope is that structureDefinitions can be re-used
Yes. In my case that is the intention.
Michael van der Zel (Jan 08 2021 at 16:53):
Jose Costa Teixeira said:
Michael van der Zel are you using sushi?
No, not using Sushi yet. We are STU3 based now.
Eric Haas (Jan 08 2021 at 18:57):
I have pondered having grouping, notes, intro as extension to SD and other conformance artifacts but it may not make anything easier. especially for large markdown content
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
