Stream: IG creation
Topic: IG Publisher Error with some Profiles
Noemi Deppenwiese (Apr 03 2020 at 06:26):
Today I noticed some new Errors in my IG QA. I have some profiles who have the same name as the resource they are constraining, e.g. a Patient profile based on Patient. All these profiles now have a StructureDefinition/Patient: StructureDefinition.differential.element[0] error Duplicate id value 'Patient' (or eqivalent) error. I noticed the publisher seems to add a new element in each differential with id: ResourceName. Could this be the source of the error?
Grahame Grieve (Apr 03 2020 at 06:32):
That's a check I just added in this version. It should not be giving that error - can I reproduce this?
Noemi Deppenwiese (Apr 03 2020 at 06:35):
Here is my IG input: https://github.com/samply/bbmri-fhir-ig/tree/feature/fullBuild
Grahame Grieve (Apr 03 2020 at 07:11):
see https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179177-conformance/topic/Element.20ID
Catherine Hosage Norman (Apr 03 2020 at 14:00):
I am getting the same Duplicate id value error. https://github.com/HL7/FHIR-pq-cmc. I thought it was because of code list because all of them were on codes.
Grahame Grieve (Apr 03 2020 at 19:11):
well, it'll be because of the ids one way or another. Do you have duplicate ids?
Giorgio Cangioli (Apr 04 2020 at 11:09):
I'm experiencing the same error with 'my' logical models, where I'm using as as id of the model the type of the model.
I can easily fix this error renaming the id, but I don't understand why I should do this and in this case the rendering of the model is "less attractive"...
Giorgio Cangioli (Apr 04 2020 at 11:13):
image.png
instead of
image.png
Giorgio Cangioli (Apr 04 2020 at 11:14):
[Q] is this issue related to https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179177-conformance/topic/Element.20ID or are two separate topics ?
Grahame Grieve (Apr 04 2020 at 11:53):
I can't see any link. The id shouldn't make any difference here
Giorgio Cangioli (Apr 04 2020 at 12:18):
with this
<StructureDefinition xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<id value="AziendaSanitaria"/>
<url value="http://hl7.it/fhir/StructureDefinition/AziendaSanitaria"/>
......
<name value="AziendaSanitaria"/>
......
<kind value="logical"/>
<abstract value="true"/>
<type value="AziendaSanitaria"/>
......
<differential>
<element id="AziendaSanitaria">
<path value="AziendaSanitaria"/>
I have this error
StructureDefinition.differential.element[0] error Duplicate id value 'AziendaSanitaria'
Giorgio Cangioli (Apr 04 2020 at 12:21):
if I make this change
<StructureDefinition xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<id value="AziendaSanitaria-lm"/>
<url value="http://hl7.it/fhir/StructureDefinition/AziendaSanitaria-lm"/>
the error disappear.
Giorgio Cangioli (Apr 04 2020 at 12:22):
but it is not clear to me why I should do that...
Grahame Grieve (Apr 04 2020 at 20:04):
the id question is the one discussed on your conformance link, about the scope of uniqueness. I don't see what it has to do with the presentation
Giorgio Cangioli (Apr 05 2020 at 12:16):
me either ... just reporting what I'm seeing :-)
if I use the same string for the id and the type (i.e the name of the model) in the column type is displayed the model name (in the example "AziendaSanitaria");
if I change the id (in the example change to "AziendaSanitaria-lm") - I've no more errors - but in the type column is shown the full URL (http://hl7.it/fhir/StaructureDefinition/AziendaSanitaria-lm).
Any suggestion ?
Grahame Grieve (Apr 05 2020 at 12:16):
well, based on the discussion in the conformance stream, I'll be removing that check in the validator
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 05 2020 at 14:52):
Removing the check completely, or allowing overlap between resource.id and snapshot and differential ids? I think that, in general, the rule should stand... Certainly within a canonical or differential ids must be unique
Grahame Grieve (Apr 05 2020 at 20:32):
the overlap bit
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
