Stream: IG creation
Topic: IG Example with unexpanded code set validator error
Corey Spears (Feb 11 2021 at 04:19):
I have a locally defined code System that has codes that belong to a proprietary code systems that requires a paid for license. That means it is unexpandable and not something that the IG publisher validator can validate against. The example files happen to have a few codes that were available on the Internet as examples. There are other valueSet bindings that would have this issue, but they are not completely local or required bindings like this one.
Any thoughts on how I can address this error?
https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/carin-bb/branches/v1.0.1/qa.html#_scratch_ig-build-temp-WP5NIU_repo_input_examples_ExplanationOfBenefit_InpatientEOBExample1
The ValueSet: https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/carin-bb/branches/v1.0.1/ValueSet-AHANUBCRevenueCodes.html
The CodeSystem: https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/carin-bb/branches/v1.0.1/CodeSystem-AHANUBCRevenueCodes.html
Rob Hausam (Feb 11 2021 at 17:30):
I expect that it's treating these as errors because the bindings are required (and presumably for those it expects to know the codes). One way to solve it might be to change the value of CodeSystem.content for NUBC Revenue Codes to 'fragment' (instead of 'not-present') and then include just the codes that you are using in the examples in the code system fragment. If you do that you I believe you shouldn't get an error. And if you want to do that, I think you should discuss that with HTA and at least make them aware (doing that probably should be legitimate, but it would be good to verify that).
Grahame Grieve (Feb 11 2021 at 20:19):
it's an error because the code system is wrong
Corey Spears (Feb 12 2021 at 17:21):
@Lloyd McKenzie @Grahame Grieve, Any thoughts on this? I would like to address all of the errors before we release the CARIN BB Technical Correction.
Thanks
Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 12 2021 at 17:27):
The value set says the code system is "https://www.nubc.org/CodeSystem/RevenueCodes". In your instance, you're declaring a code system of "http://www.nubc.org/RevenueCodes"
The two need to be the same. Not sure which is correct. Hopefully you've engaged the HTA to get an official decision?
Corey Spears (Feb 18 2021 at 01:53):
Thanks. Don't I feel foolish now. Thinking it was a hidden issue with the IG, I was focusing solely on that. Making it harder than it is.
Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 18 2021 at 01:55):
No worries. We're all extremely well-practiced at making things harder than they are :)
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
