Stream: IG creation
Topic: Help with Weird Validator Complaints
Saul Kravitz (Jan 15 2020 at 20:08):
I'm working on the DaVinci PDEX Plan-Net IG. We made some minor changes to our definitions of extensions and the associated example data.
Now, the validator is complaining about an example, and I've stared at it and can't figure out why the complaint, and how to mitigate.
The validator doesn't like my example for Endpoint following the IG change (type/standard).
Here is the error: https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-pdex-plan-net/qa.html#_scratch_ig-build-temp-TZ8KIP_repo_examples_Endpoint-direct321
Here is the extension in question: https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-pdex-plan-net/StructureDefinition-plannet-EndpointUseCase-extension.html
Any insights? THANK YOU.
Lloyd McKenzie (Jan 15 2020 at 22:52):
<element id="Extension.extension:type.valueCodeableConcept">
<path value="Extension.extension.valueCodeableConcept"/>
Those should be value[x] rather than valueCodeableConcept. Same issue with your valueUri on the second child extension. DOn't know that that will fix your issue though.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
